Parasites & Vectors (Mar 2024)

Onchocerca volvulus microfilariae in the anterior chambers of the eye and ocular adverse events after a single dose of 8 mg moxidectin or 150 µg/kg ivermectin: results of a randomized double-blind Phase 3 trial in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ghana and Liberia

  • Eric M. Kanza,
  • Amos Nyathirombo,
  • Jemmah P. Larbelee,
  • Nicholas O. Opoku,
  • Didier K. Bakajika,
  • Hayford M. Howard,
  • Germain L. Mambandu,
  • Maurice M. Nigo,
  • Deogratias Ucima Wonyarossi,
  • Françoise Ngave,
  • Kambale Kasonia Kennedy,
  • Kambale Kataliko,
  • Kpehe M. Bolay,
  • Simon K. Attah,
  • George Olipoh,
  • Sampson Asare,
  • Mupenzi Mumbere,
  • Michel Vaillant,
  • Christine M. Halleux,
  • Annette C. Kuesel

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-06087-3
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 1
pp. 1 – 23

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background After ivermectin became available, diethylcarbamazine (DEC) use was discontinued because of severe adverse reactions, including ocular reactions, in individuals with high Onchocerca volvulus microfilaridermia (microfilariae/mg skin, SmfD). Assuming long-term ivermectin use led to 40) mfAC and three pre-treatment ( 0–5, > 5) SmfD categories. A linear mixed model evaluated factors and covariates impacting mfAC levels. Ocular AEs were summarized by type and start post-treatment. Logistic models evaluated factors and covariates impacting the risk for ocular AEs. Results Moxidectin and ivermectin had the same effect on mfAC levels. These increased from pre-treatment to Day 4 and Month 1 in 20% and 16% of participants, respectively. Six and 12 months post-treatment, mfAC were detected in ≈5% and ≈3% of participants, respectively. Ocular Mazzotti reactions occurred in 12.4% of moxidectin- and 10.2% of ivermectin-treated participants without difference in type or severity. The risk for ≥ 1 ocular Mazzotti reaction increased for women (OR 1.537, 95% CI 1.096–2.157) and with mfAC levels pre- and 4 days post-treatment (OR 0: > 10 mfAC 2.704, 95% CI 1.27–5.749 and 1.619, 95% CI 0.80–3.280, respectively). Conclusions The impact of SmfD and mfAC levels before and early after treatment on ocular AEs needs to be better understood before making decisions on the risk-benefit of strategies including DEC. Such decisions should take into account interindividual variability in SmfD, mfAC levels and treatment response and risks to even a small percentage of individuals. Graphical Abstract

Keywords