Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (Dec 2015)

Impact or push-off lameness presentation is not altered by the type of track surface where horses are trotted

  • M.S. Azevedo,
  • F.D.D.L. Côrte,
  • K.E. Brass,
  • M. Gallio,
  • S.L Dau,
  • R. Pozzobon,
  • M.A.F Lopes,
  • L.F.D Lopes

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-8454
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 67, no. 6
pp. 1475 – 1482

Abstract

Read online

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of the track surface on which horses are examined, regarding the phase of lameness presentation. Ten horses with lameness in at least one limb were evaluated with wireless inertial sensors on three track surfaces (concrete, loose sand and grass). Six crossover track sequences were established. The variables vector sum, maximum and minimum height of the head and pelvis, variation coefficient of the maximum and minimum height of the head and pelvis were analyzed using ANOVA, followed by Tukey test to compare means between track surface and sequence, at 5% significance level. The lameness phase (impact or pushoff) was analyzed considering the proportion of affected animals. There were no differences on vector sum, maximum and minimum height or variation coefficient of head and pelvis. Difference was observed on the number of strides registered on sand compared to grass and concrete (p <0.0001) for fore and hindlimbs. Impact lameness on forelimbs was presented by a larger number of animals on the concrete surface; pushoff lameness was more evident on the grass surface. In the hindlimbs, impact lameness was more evident on the grass surface, while pushoff lameness was in greater number of animals on concrete surfaces. The track sequence on which horses were trotted during evaluation does not seem to be a factor, but the number of lame horses and the phase of lameness manifestation can vary between track surfaces, as some horses showed impact lameness on soft ground and elevation lameness on hard ground.

Keywords