PLoS ONE (Jan 2023)

Considerations in implementation of social risk factor screening and referral in maternal and infant care in Washington, DC: A qualitative study.

  • Jason Brown,
  • Naheed Ahmed,
  • Matthew Biel,
  • Loral Patchen,
  • Janine Rethy,
  • Angela Thomas,
  • Hannah Arem

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283815
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 4
p. e0283815

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundThe District of Columbia (DC) has striking disparities in maternal and infant outcomes comparing Black to White women and babies. Social determinants of health (SDoH) are widely recognized as a significant contributor to these disparities in health outcomes. Screening for social risk factors and referral for appropriate services is a critical step in addressing social needs and reducing outcome disparities.MethodsWe conducted interviews among employees (n = 18) and patients (n = 9) across three diverse, urban clinics within a healthcare system and one community-based organization involved in a five-year initiative to reduce maternal and infant disparities in DC. Interviews were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to understand current processes and organizational factors that contributed to or impeded delivery of social risk factor screening and referral for indicated needs.ResultsWe found that current processes for social risk factor screening and referral differed between and within clinics depending on the patient population. Key facilitators of successful screening included a supportive organizational culture and adaptability of more patient-centered screening processes. Key barriers to delivery included high patient volume and limited electronic health record capabilities to record results and track the status of internal and community referrals. Areas identified for improvement included additional social risk factor assessment training for new providers, patient-centered approaches to screening, improved tracking processes, and facilitation of connections to social services within clinical settings.ConclusionDespite proliferation of social risk factor screeners and recognition of their importance within health care settings, few studies detail implementation processes for social risk factor screening and referrals. Future studies should test implementation strategies for screening and referral services to address identified barriers to implementation.