Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Jul 2004)

Fluxo no ducto venoso e hipertrofia miocárdica em fetos de mães diabéticas Ductus venosus flow and myocardial hypertrophy in fetuses of diabetic mothers

  • Paulo Zielinsky,
  • Silvana Marcantonio,
  • Luiz Henrique Nicoloso,
  • Stelamaris Luchese,
  • Domingos Hatem,
  • Marlui Scheid,
  • João Luiz Mânica,
  • Eduardo Ioschpe Gus,
  • Fabíola Satler,
  • Antônio L. Piccoli Jr.

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0066-782X2004001300005
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 83, no. 1
pp. 45 – 50

Abstract

Read online

OBJETIVO: Testar a hipótese de que o índice de pulsatilidade do ducto venoso (IPDV) é maior nos fetos de mães diabéticas (FMD) com hipertrofia miocárdica (HM) do que em FMD sem HM e em fetos controles de mães não diabéticas (FMND) comparando os resultados com os picos de velocidade dos fluxos diastólicos nas valvas mitral e tricúspide. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal incluindo fetos com idade gestacional entre 20 semanas até o termo, divididos em 3 grupos: 56 FMD com HM (grupo I), 36 FMD sem HM (grupo II) e 53 FMND (grupo III, controle). O Doppler-ecocardiograma avaliou o IPDV através da razão (velocidade sistólica - velocidade pré-sistólica)/velocidade média. As ondas E e A dos fluxos mitral e tricúspide foram também avaliadas. RESULTADOS: A média do IPDV no grupo I foi de 1,13 ± 0,64, no grupo II, de 0,84 ± 0,38 e no grupo III de 0,61±0,17. Aplicando-se a ANOVA e o teste de Tukey, houve diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os 3 grupos (p= 0,015 entre os grupos I e II, p OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that the pulsatility index of ductus venosus (PIDV) is greater in the fetuses of diabetic mothers (FDM) with myocardial hypertrophy (MH) than in the FDM with no MH and in the control fetuses of nondiabetic mothers (FNDM). Comparing the results with mitral and tricuspid diastolic peak flows. METHODS: The cross-sectional study included fetuses with gestational ages ranging from 20 weeks to term, divided into the following 3 groups: 56 FDM with MH (group I), 36 FDM with no MH (group II), and 53 FNDM (group III, control). The Doppler echocardiogram assessed the PIDV through the ratio (systolic velocity - presystolic velocity)/mean velocity. The mitral and tricuspid E and A waves were also assessed. RESULTS: The mean PIDV in groups I, II, and III were 1.13 ± 0.64, 0.84 ± 0.38, and 0.61±0.17, respectively. Using ANOVA and the Tukey test, a statistically significant difference was found in the 3 groups (P = 0.015 between groups I and II; P < 0.001 between groups I and III; and P = 0.017 between groups II and III). The mean mitral E wave was significantly greater in group I (0.39 ± 0.12 m/s) than in groups II (0.32 ± 0.08 m/s) (P = 0.024) and III (0.32 ± 0.08 m/s) (P = 0.023). The mean tricuspid E wave was also greater in group I (0.43 ± 0.1 m/s) than in group III (0.35 ± 0.10 m/s) (P = 0.031). CONCLUSION: The PIDV is significantly greater in FDM with MH than in FDM with no MH and in FNDM. Because the PIDV may represent modifications in ventricular compliance, this index may be a more sensitive parameter for assessing fetal diastolic function.

Keywords