Journal of Translational Medicine (Apr 2020)

The Great Debate at “Melanoma Bridge”, Naples, December 7th, 2019

  • Paolo A. Ascierto,
  • Sanjiv S. Agarwala,
  • Alexander Eggermont,
  • Jeffrey E. Gershenwald,
  • Jean-Jacques Grob,
  • Omid Hamid,
  • Olivier Michielin,
  • Michael Postow,
  • Igor Puzanov,
  • Hassane M. Zarour,
  • Corrado Caracò,
  • Alessandro Testori

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02340-w
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 1
pp. 1 – 15

Abstract

Read online

Abstract The Great Debate session at the 2019 Melanoma Bridge congress (December 5-7, Naples, Italy) featured counterpoint views from experts on five topical issues in melanoma. These were whether to choose local intratumoral treatment or systemic treatment, whether patients with stage IIIA melanoma require adjuvant therapy or not, whether treatment is better changed at disease progression or during stable disease, whether adoptive cell transfer (ACT) therapy is more appropriate used before or in combination with checkpoint inhibition therapy, and whether treatment can be stopped while the patient is still on response. As was the case for previous meetings, the debates were assigned by meeting Chairs. As such, positions taken by each of the melanoma experts during the debates may not have reflected their respective personal approach.

Keywords