Comparative efficacy of nine exercise methods on the prognosis in chronic kidney disease patients with hemodialysis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Abstract

Abstract Background Several kinds of physical activities have been applied to improve the prognosis of patients with hemodialysis (HD). However, the comparative efficacy of physical activities on the outcomes in HD patients is still unknown. This study explored the effectiveness and safety of all exercise types in HD patients. Methods We searched randomized clinical trials from the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Physical exercises interventions included resistance exercise (RE), aerobic exercise (AE), electrical muscle stimulation (EMS), range of motion (ROM), resistance exercise + aerobic exercise (RE + AE), stretching exercise (STE), respiratory muscle training (RMT), peripheral muscle training (PMT), walking exercise (WE), or usual care/sham exercise (UC/SE). Primary outcomes were six-minute walk test (6-mwt) and quality of life (QOL). Secondary outcomes were Kt/V, VO2max, hemoglobin (Hb), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (sbp and dbp). Frequentist network meta-analysis with multivariate random effects models provided mean with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Results A total of 58 eligible studies were included. AE, RMT, and RE + AE significantly improved 6-mwt compared with UC/SE. SE was the worst intervention and reduced QOL much more than the UC/SE and other exercise types. AE and RE + AE were associated with higher VO2max, while ROM and RE + AE induced higher Hb levels. All physical activities did not elevate blood pressure, CRP and IL-6. Only ROM decreased sbp/dbp. CRP is significantly lower in RE. Conclusion Physical activities play a crucial role in the different outcomes of HD patients. They can be applied to specific area for their specific efficacy.

Keywords

• Hemodialysis
• Efficacy
• Exercise
• Network meta-analysis