Phase I study of novel SYK inhibitor TAK‐659 (mivavotinib) in combination with R‐CHOP for front‐line treatment of high‐risk diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma
Reem Karmali,
Frederique St‐Pierre,
Shuo Ma,
Kelly D. Foster,
Jason Kaplan,
Xinlei Mi,
Barbara Pro,
Jane N. Winter,
Leo I. Gordon
Affiliations
Reem Karmali
Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA
Frederique St‐Pierre
Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA
Shuo Ma
Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA
Kelly D. Foster
Northwestern Medicine Lake Forest Hospital Lake Forest Illinois USA
Jason Kaplan
Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA
Xinlei Mi
Department of Preventative Medicine ‐ Biostatistics, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA
Barbara Pro
Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA
Jane N. Winter
Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA
Leo I. Gordon
Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA
Abstract Background: TAK‐659, a novel oral SYK inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in heavily pretreated diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We report results of a phase I single‐institution escalation study of front‐line treatment with R‐CHOP and TAK‐659 in treatment‐naïve high‐risk DLBCL. Methods: Patients with high‐risk DLBCL were treated with R‐CHOP for 1 cycle, followed by combined R‐CHOP and TAK‐659 for an additional five cycles, with TAK‐659 dosing escalated from 60 mg, to 80 mg, to 100 mg daily, based on a 3 + 3 design. The primary objective was to determine the safety and establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of TAK‐659 in this setting. Results: Twelve patients were enrolled. Dose level 3 (100 mg) was established as the MTD. Dose level 1 (60 mg) maintained a similar area under the curve (AUC) to the MTD. With a median follow‐up of 21 months, 92% of patients achieved complete response (CR). The most common treatment‐emergent adverse events were lymphopenia (100%), infection (50%, n = 3 opportunistic), aspartate aminotransferase elevation (100%), and alanine aminotransferase elevation (83%). Conclusion: A TAK‐659 dose of 60 mg was well tolerated, did not require dose modifications, and maintained a similar AUC to the MTD. The combination of R‐CHOP and TAK‐659 in patients with newly diagnosed high‐risk DLBCL produces promising CR rates.