Patient Reported Outcomes Following Hindfoot Fusion Utilizing the Triple Arthrodesis Procedure

Abstract

Category: Hindfoot; Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: Fusions are used as a salvage procedure to improve stability and return patient to regular functions of daily activities. Triple Arthrodesis is a fusion of three joints, talonavicular, subtalar, calcaneocuboid. There is limited literature on the patient-reported long-term outcomes for this procedure. The aim of this study is to quantify the patient-reported outcomes for the Triple Arthrodesis procedure. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted for patients that underwent Triple Arthrodesis at our facility from 2014-2021. Using the electronic medical record (EMR), basic patient demographics, time since surgery, presence of osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, development of infection, nonunion, hardware failure, and history of previous foot and ankle procedures were all noted. Additionally, we recorded the hardware used during the operation and whether concomitant procedures were performed during the time of surgery. To evaluate outcomes, we used the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) survey and Foot Function Index (FFI) scores. Results: A total of 132 patients were included in this study with 50 participants completing the PROMIS and FFI surveys. The average time point at which the outcomes were collected was 5.50 years postoperatively. Postoperative PROMIS scores for physical function, pain interference, and depression were all within one standard deviation of the reference population. The average PROMIS physical function was 38.35, pain interference was 61.52, and depression was 49.82 for this population. The mean FFI scores were 58.56 for pain, 60.06 for disability, 48.06 for activity limitation. There was a significant decrease in postoperative pain scores when compared to preoperative pain of 5.4 to 2.55 (p=0.023). Four patients experienced wound infection, four patients experienced nonunion, six patients required revisional surgery, and three patients experienced hardware failure. Conclusion: Preliminary results Triple Arthrodesis may be beneficial in decreasing pain and lead variable long-term patient satisfaction. We plan to include further statistical analysis comparing the various types of fixation techniques used and the resultant PROMIS and FFI scores. Additionally, we are currently continuing patient calls to collect more completed PROMIS and FFI reports.