Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes (Oct 2023)

Assessment of Prevalence, Clinical Characteristics, and Risk Factors Associated With “Low Flow State” Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

  • Yifang Yuan, MD,
  • David Herrington, MD,
  • Joao A.C. Lima, MD,
  • R. Brandon Stacey, MD,
  • David Zhao, MD,
  • James Thomas, MD,
  • Mario Garcia, MD,
  • Min Pu, MD, PhD

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 5
pp. 443 – 451

Abstract

Read online

Objective: To assess prevalence, clinical characteristics, and risk factors associated with low flow state (LFS) in a multiethnic population with normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Patients and Methods: The study included 4398 asymptomatic participants undergoing cardiac magnetic resonance from July 17, 2000, to August 29, 2002. Left ventricular (LV) mass, volume, and myocardial contraction fraction were assessed. Low flow state was defined as stroke volume index (SVi of <35 mL/m2). Clinical characteristics, cardiac risk factors, and cardiac magnetic resonance findings were compared between LFS and normal flow state (NFS) groups (NFS: SVi of ≥35 mL/m2). Results: There were significant differences in the prevalence of LFS in different ethnic groups. Individuals with LFS were older (66±9.6 vs 61±10 years; P<.0001). The prevalence of LFS was 19% in the group aged older than 70 years. The logistic multivariable regression analysis found that age was independently associated with LFS. The LFS group had significantly higher prevalence of diabetes (30% vs 24%; P=.001), LV mass-volume ratio (1.13±0.22 vs 0.91±0.15; P<.0001), inflammatory markers, a lower LV mass index (59±10 vs 65±11 kg/m2; P<.001), lower myocardial contraction fraction (58.1±10.6% vs 75.7±13%; P<.001), and a lower left atrial size index (32.2±4.6 vs 36.7±5.9 mm/m2; P<.0001) than NFS. Conclusion: Low flow state may be considered an under-recognized clinical entity associated with increasing age, multiple risk factors, increased inflammatory markers, a lower LV mass index, and suboptimal myocardial performance despite the presence of normal LVEF and absence of valvular disease.