Translational Psychiatry (Sep 2023)

Polygenic risk scores of lithium response and treatment resistance in major depressive disorder

  • Ying Xiong,
  • Robert Karlsson,
  • Jie Song,
  • Kaarina Kowalec,
  • Christian Rück,
  • Robert Sigström,
  • Lina Jonsson,
  • Caitlin C. Clements,
  • Evelyn Andersson,
  • Julia Boberg,
  • Cathryn M. Lewis,
  • Patrick F. Sullivan,
  • Mikael Landén,
  • Yi Lu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-023-02602-3
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 1
pp. 1 – 7

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Treatment response and resistance in major depressive disorder (MDD) are suggested to be heritable. Due to significant challenges in defining treatment-related phenotypes, our understanding of their genetic bases is limited. This study aimed to derive a stringent definition of treatment resistance and to investigate the genetic overlap between treatment response and resistance in MDD. Using electronic medical records on the use of antidepressants and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) from Swedish registers, we derived the phenotype of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and non-TRD within ~4500 individuals with MDD in three Swedish cohorts. Considering antidepressants and lithium are first-line treatment and augmentation used for MDD, respectively, we generated polygenic risk scores (PRS) of antidepressants and lithium response for individuals with MDD and evaluated their associations with treatment resistance by comparing TRD with non-TRD. Among 1778 ECT-treated MDD cases, nearly all (94%) used antidepressants before their first ECT and the vast majority had at least one (84%) or two (61%) antidepressants of adequate duration, suggesting these MDD cases receiving ECT were resistant to antidepressants. We did not observe a significant difference in the mean PRS of antidepressant response between TRD and non-TRD; however, we found that TRD cases had a significantly higher PRS of lithium response compared to non-TRD cases (OR = 1.10–1.12 under various definitions). The results support the evidence of heritable components in treatment-related phenotypes and highlight the overall genetic profile of lithium-sensitivity in TRD. This finding further provides a genetic explanation for lithium efficacy in treating TRD.