13 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
Carl Eriksson
3 Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
Sven Almer
4 Centre for Digestive Health, Department of Gastroenterology, Dermatovenereology and Rheumatology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Jan Marsal
11 Department of Gastroenterology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö/Lund, Sweden
Åsa V Keita
14 Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Johan D Söderholm
14 Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Francesca Bresso
Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Olof Grip
11 Department of Gastroenterology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö/Lund, Sweden
Charlotte R H Hedin
4 Centre for Digestive Health, Department of Gastroenterology, Dermatovenereology and Rheumatology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Daniel Bergemalm
3 Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
Jóhann P Hreinsson
9 Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
Dirk Repsilber
1 School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
Benita Salomon
1 School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
Olle Grännö
2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
Hans Strid
4 Centre for Digestive Health, Department of Gastroenterology, Dermatovenereology and Rheumatology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Adam Carstens
5 Department of Internal Medicine, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Henrik Hjortswang
7 Department of Gastroenterology, County Council of Östergötland, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
André Blomberg
12 Department of Medicine, Geriatrics and Emergency Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Östra Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
Niloofar Nikaein
1 School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
Shoaib Bakhtyar
1 School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
Carl Mårten Lindqvist
1 School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
Elisabeth Hultgren Hörnquist
1 School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
Maria K Magnusson
13 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
Marie Carlson
8 Department of Medical Sciences, Gastroenterology Research Group, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
Robert Kruse
1 School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
Maria Ling Lundström
8 Department of Medical Sciences, Gastroenterology Research Group, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
Purpose There is a need for diagnostic and prognostic biosignatures to improve long-term outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Here, we describe the establishment of the Swedish Inception Cohort in IBD (SIC-IBD) and demonstrate its potential for the identification of such signatures.Participants Patients aged ≥18 years with gastrointestinal symptoms who were referred to the gastroenterology unit due to suspected IBD at eight Swedish hospitals between November 2011 and March 2021 were eligible for inclusion.Findings to date In total, 367 patients with IBD (Crohn’s disease, n=142; ulcerative colitis, n=201; IBD-unclassified, n=24) and 168 symptomatic controls were included. In addition, 59 healthy controls without gastrointestinal symptoms were recruited as a second control group. Biospecimens and clinical data were collected at inclusion and in patients with IBD also during follow-up to 10 years. Levels of faecal calprotectin and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were higher in patients with IBD compared with symptomatic controls and healthy controls. Preliminary results highlight the potential of serum protein signatures and autoantibodies, as well as results from faecal markers, to differentiate between IBD and symptomatic controls in the cohort. During the first year of follow-up, 37% (53/142) of the patients with Crohn’s disease, 24% (48/201) with ulcerative colitis and 4% (1/24) with IBD-U experienced an aggressive disease course.Future plans We have established an inception cohort enabling ongoing initiatives to collect and generate clinical data and multi-omics datasets. The cohort will allow analyses for translation into candidate biosignatures to support clinical decision-making in IBD. Additionally, the data will provide insights into mechanisms of disease pathogenesis.