Applied and Computational Mechanics (Jun 2022)
On fatigue life predictions for notched members by the nominal stress-based and the local strain-based methods
Abstract
Traditional engineering models for addressing fatigue issues are based on empirical relations between the necessary number of cycles for fatigue failures N_f and either, the nominal stress σ_an or the local strain ε_a amplitudes. The aim of the present paper is to highlight the advantages of the local strain-based approach εN for fatigue assessment of notched components over the more traditional stress-based approach σN . Since a closed form solution for the ratio between fatigue life predictions among the two methods does not exist, we have considered a hypothetical case study that included variables such as the applied stress, the stress concentration factor and the structural material, and numerically calculated the expected fatigue life according to each approach. In order to highlight the differences related with the stress-strain analysis, the applied nominal stresses (uniaxial) were limited to the elastic region where both methods use approximately the same fatigue strength curve. Additionally a unique and equal function for accounting for the mean stress effects was incorporated in both approaches. Fatigue life predictions are expressed in universal graphs of normalized stress versus the N_f^ratio, the latter parameter defined as the quotient between the N_f predictions according to the σN and εN approaches, considering the average values for a group of sixty structural steels at each load level. The results confirm that fatigue life predictions under the traditional stress based approach are conservative when compared to the strain based approach for all the possible scenarios described by the variables involved.
Keywords