Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (Sep 2022)

The guiding value of hybrid resting full-cycle ratio and fractional flow reserve strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention in a Chinese real-world cohort with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome

  • Yumeng Lei,
  • Shuaiyong Zhang,
  • Mengyao Li,
  • Jiawang Wang,
  • Yunfei Wang,
  • Lei Zhao,
  • Wei Yan,
  • Ming Chen,
  • Yanjie Su,
  • Jing Yu,
  • Na Yu,
  • Tongjun Dong,
  • Xufen Cao,
  • Liqiu Yan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.991161
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9

Abstract

Read online

ObjectiveThe study aimed to assess the correlation and agreement between resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR), and evaluate the guiding value of a hybrid RFR-FFR strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a Chinese real-world cohort with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).Materials and methodsA total of 109 patients with NSTE-ACS (149 diseased vessels), who underwent an invasive physiological assessment in Cangzhou Central Hospital, Hebei Medical University, were prospectively enrolled from September 2021 to May 2022. FFR ≤ 0.80 was used as the gold standard for coronary artery functional ischemia. We utilized the Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis to assess the correlation and agreement between RFR and FFR. The diagnostic value of RFR predicting FFR ≤ 0.80 was evaluated in accordance with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The hybrid RFR-FFR strategy, which was established according to determining the “gray zone” of RFR (FFR was further assessed using vasodilators only for diseased vessels in the “gray zone”), needed to afford over 95% global agreement with the FFR-only strategy.ResultsResting full-cycle ratio was significantly linearly linked with FFR (R2 = 0.636, P < 0.001). The accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity for RFR ≤ 0.89 predicting FFR ≤ 0.80 were 81.2, 70.8, and 86.1%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve for RFR predicting FFR ≤ 0.80 was 0.881 (P < 0.001), and the cutoff value was 0.90. The “gray zone” of RFR was 0.85–0.93. The positive and negative predictive values of the hybrid RFR-FFR strategy were 0.95 and 0.93, respectively. The hybrid RFR-FFR strategy exhibited an agreement of 96.0% with FFR and obviated the need for a vasodilator by 60.4%.ConclusionResting full-cycle ratio and FFR have high correlation and consistency. The hybrid RFR-FFR strategy highlights considerably enhanced agreement with the FFR-only strategy, whilst making the requirement of vasodilator administration less than a half.

Keywords