Investigation of Components of Psychological Operations Based on the Semiotics of Double Conflicts In the debate, "Saadi's Controversy"

Abstract

The story of the debate between Saadi and the contender is one of the best debates of Persian literature that has been repeatedly investigated, but debates as one of the techniques of psychological operations (the power of influencing the mind and mind of the audience indirectly and better transfer Concept and Thought) has not been analyzed. To this end, in this study, by identifying the components of the psychological operations available in the debate as one of the "psychological operations techniques" using the semiotics of Levi Strause's dual contradictions, Saadi's methods and approaches were pursued to achieve the desired goals. Been investigated. According to the results, Saadi, using the layout of the contradictions, with the purpose and the previous planning, in the form of a deliberate debate with his subtlety, his intuitive thought and thought to the audience, in the latent layer of the story (profound construction) Has transmitted. In order to achieve this, he has used the components of psychological operations in the form of a beautiful debate. In this way, Saadi has analyzed the contradictions of the conflicts and the contradictions of these two strata, and ultimately, with the adventures and disadvantages of both groups, the goal of balancing is reached in the face of social conflict. And introduces a new classification of these two strata to the audience

Keywords

• saadi
• psychological operations
• debate
• semiotics of dual contrasts