Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (Oct 2022)

Using artificial intelligence in the development of diagnostic models of coronary artery disease with imaging markers: A scoping review

  • Xiao Wang,
  • Xiao Wang,
  • Xiao Wang,
  • Junfeng Wang,
  • Wenjun Wang,
  • Wenjun Wang,
  • Wenjun Wang,
  • Mingxiang Zhu,
  • Mingxiang Zhu,
  • Mingxiang Zhu,
  • Hua Guo,
  • Junyu Ding,
  • Jin Sun,
  • Jin Sun,
  • Jin Sun,
  • Di Zhu,
  • Di Zhu,
  • Di Zhu,
  • Yongjie Duan,
  • Yongjie Duan,
  • Yongjie Duan,
  • Xu Chen,
  • Xu Chen,
  • Xu Chen,
  • Peifang Zhang,
  • Zhenzhou Wu,
  • Kunlun He,
  • Kunlun He,
  • Kunlun He

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.945451
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundCoronary artery disease (CAD) is a progressive disease of the blood vessels supplying the heart, which leads to coronary artery stenosis or obstruction and is life-threatening. Early diagnosis of CAD is essential for timely intervention. Imaging tests are widely used in diagnosing CAD, and artificial intelligence (AI) technology is used to shed light on the development of new imaging diagnostic markers.ObjectiveWe aim to investigate and summarize how AI algorithms are used in the development of diagnostic models of CAD with imaging markers.MethodsThis scoping review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guideline. Eligible articles were searched in PubMed and Embase. Based on the predefined included criteria, articles on coronary heart disease were selected for this scoping review. Data extraction was independently conducted by two reviewers, and a narrative synthesis approach was used in the analysis.ResultsA total of 46 articles were included in the scoping review. The most common types of imaging methods complemented by AI included single-photon emission computed tomography (15/46, 32.6%) and coronary computed tomography angiography (15/46, 32.6%). Deep learning (DL) (41/46, 89.2%) algorithms were used more often than machine learning algorithms (5/46, 10.8%). The models yielded good model performance in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC. However, most of the primary studies used a relatively small sample (n < 500) in model development, and only few studies (4/46, 8.7%) carried out external validation of the AI model.ConclusionAs non-invasive diagnostic methods, imaging markers integrated with AI have exhibited considerable potential in the diagnosis of CAD. External validation of model performance and evaluation of clinical use aid in the confirmation of the added value of markers in practice.Systematic review registration[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022306638], identifier [CRD42022306638].

Keywords