Immunity, Inflammation and Disease (Nov 2023)

Evaluation of risk factors for cytomegalovirus DNAemia after end of regular prophylaxis after heart transplantation

  • Moritz Benjamin Immohr,
  • Daniel Oehler,
  • Freya Sophie Jenkins,
  • Nikolas Kalampokas,
  • Vincent Hendrik Hettlich,
  • Dennis Sigetti,
  • Fabian Voß,
  • Hannan Dalyanoglu,
  • Hug Aubin,
  • Payam Akhyari,
  • Artur Lichtenberg,
  • Udo Boeken

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/iid3.1075
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 11
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections after heart transplantation (HTx) can cause cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Consequently, monitoring and prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus deoxyribonucleic acid (CMV‐DNAemia) within the first weeks after HTx is recommended. Methods All patients who underwent HTx between September 2010 and 2021 surviving the first 90 days (n = 196) were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided on the prevalence of CMV‐DNAemia during the first postoperative year after the end of the prophylaxis. A total of n = 35 (20.1%) developed CMV‐DNAemia (CMV group) and were compared to patients without CMV‐DNAemia (controls, n = 139). The remaining patients (n = 22) were excluded due to incomplete data. Results Positive donors and negative recipients (D+/R−) and negative donors and positive recipients (D−/R+) serology was significantly increased and D−/R− decreased in the CMV group (p < .01). Furthermore, the mean age was 57.7 ± 8.7 years but only 53.6 ± 10.0 years for controls (p = .03). Additionally, the intensive care unit (p = .02) and total hospital stay (p = .03) after HTx were approximately 50% longer. Interestingly, the incidence of CMV‐DNAemia during prophylaxis was only numerically increased in the CMV group (5.7%, respectively, 0.7%, p = .10), the same effect was also observed for postoperative infections. Multivariate analyses confirmed that D+/R− and D−/R+ CMV immunoglobulin G match were independent risk factors for postprophylaxis CMV‐DNAemia. Conclusion Our data should raise awareness of CMV‐DNAemia after the termination of regular prophylaxis, as this affects one in five HTx patients. Especially old recipients as well as D+/R− and D−/R+ serology share an elevated risk of late CMV‐DNAemia. For these patients, prolongation, or repetition of CMV prophylaxis, including antiviral drugs and CMV immunoglobulins, may be considered.

Keywords