Arthroscopic lasso-loop technique for subscapularis repair with anterolateral viewing portal yields better clinical outcomes for Lafosse grade 3 and 4 tears: a prospective study with minimum 2 years of follow-up

Abstract

Background: Contracted subscapularis tears, especially Lafosse grade 3 and 4, pose a significant challenge in surgical repair due to the need for extensive release of retracted tendon and the risk of cut-through due to poor tissue quality. The posterior viewing portal may hinder adequate visualization and extensive release of retracted tendons, particularly in addressing the bursal surface of the tears. Tension-free robust repair is critical to prevent retears and for achieving successful outcomes for these massive and complex retracted tears. This study investigates the clinical outcomes of the Lasso-Loop technique with an anterolateral viewing portal, aiming to enhance tendon release, improve footprint fixation, and optimize tissue grip, particularly in cases of chronic retracted Lafosse 3 and 4 tears. This innovation also eliminates the need for arthroscope switching and serves as a crucial measure for averting axillary nerve injuries during the procedure. Methods: The study included 40 patients with isolated subscapularis or combined anterosuperior rotator cuff tears (Lafosse grade 3 and 4) that underwent arthroscopic subscapularis repair using a Lasso-Loop technique through an anterolateral viewing portal. Evaluations were conducted both preoperatively and at predefined postoperative intervals: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. The evaluations in this study encompassed a comprehensive range of clinical assessments, which included a complete range of movements, specialized tests for subscapularis muscle functionality (specifically the lift-off test and belly press test), the utilization of the University of California at Los Angeles and Oxford shoulder scoring systems, and a postoperative ultrasonography conducted at the 6-month mark to assess the presence of any retear. Clinical outcomes were compared with that of the opposite normal shoulder. Results: There was considerable improvement in the active painless range of motion postoperatively. During the 2-year follow-up, the positive belly press test decreased from 50% (n = 20) to 2.5% (n = 1), while the positive lift-off test decreased from 100% (n = 40) to 5% (n = 2). The modified University of California at Los Angeles score increased significantly from 10.15 preoperatively to 30.17 at 2 years postoperatively (P value = .001). Oxford’s Shoulder Score increased significantly from 15.6 preoperatively to 40.64 at 2 years postoperatively (P value = .001). Conclusion: This technique has produced positive functional outcomes, in cases categorized as massive subscapularis tears and chronic tears indicating the superiority over other conventional techniques of subscapularis repair described in the literature.

Keywords

• Level IV
• Case Series
• Treatment Study