L’argumentation sur la titulature impériale dans la dynastie Ming au prisme de la « Théorie généralisée de l’argumentation »

Abstract

By using the Generalized Argumentation Theory, this paper tries to reveal the rules and structures of the argumentation about the imperial title issue in the Great Ritual Controversy. Our analysis shows that both the protagonist and the antagonist follow ancient Chinese political system and cultural traditions, and appeal to ancient classics and historical events in order to defend their claims. With these rules, the argumentation about the issue is demonstrated. Finally, this paper shows that: 1) Generalized Argumentation Theory and its methods are tolerant of cultural pluralism (including mainstream culture); 2) it is feasible to describe and evaluate arguments through socio-cultural interpretation.

Keywords

• ancient Chinese logic
• generalized argumentation
• political argumentation in Ming dynasty
• socio-cultural interpretation