PLoS ONE (Jan 2022)

Management of de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A comprehensive report of a single-center experience.

  • Sunny Guin,
  • Bobby K Liaw,
  • Tomi Jun,
  • Kristin Ayers,
  • Bonny Patel,
  • Timmy O'Connell,
  • Matthew Deitz,
  • Michael Klein,
  • Tommy Mullaney,
  • Tony Prentice,
  • Scott Newman,
  • Marc Fink,
  • Xiang Zhou,
  • Eric E Schadt,
  • Rong Chen,
  • William K Oh

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264800
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 8
p. e0264800

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundUpfront docetaxel or novel hormonal agents (NHA) such as abiraterone and enzalutamide have become the standard of care for metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). We evaluated real-world management of patients treated with these agents at a single center.Patients and methodsPatients with de novo mHSPC treated with upfront docetaxel or an NHA between January 2014 and April 2019 at Mount Sinai Health System were included. We evaluated time to next treatment (TTNT), PSA progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after initial treatment with these drugs. Kaplan Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used for analysis. We additionally assessed the prognostic value of post-treatment PSA.ResultsWe identified 94 de novo mHSPC patients; 52 and 42 treated with upfront docetaxel and NHAs, respectively. NHAs were associated with a median TTNT of 20.7 months compared to 10.1 months with docetaxel (log-rank p = 0.023). We also observed median PSA PFS of 19 months for NHAs and 13.2 months for docetaxel (p = 0.069). However, OS between the two treatment groups was unchanged. Among docetaxel treated patients, TTNT was shorter among those with high metastasis burden (9.63 vs 25.5 months, p = 0.026) which was not observed among NHA treated patients (25.1 vs 20.7 months, p = 0.79). Regardless of treatment, lower post-treatment PSA levels were associated with improved TTNT (58.95 vs. 11.57 vs. 9.4 months for PSA ≤0.2, 0.2-0.4, >0.4ng/ml, respectively; pConclusionReal world data demonstrated a shorter duration of treatment with docetaxel than NHAs, reflecting the time-limited nature of docetaxel regimens compared to the treat-till-progression approach of NHAs. While TTNT was generally longer for NHAs than docetaxel, some docetaxel-treated patients achieved significant periods of time off treatment. In addition, the depth of PSA response following combination treatment may hold prognostic value for mHSPC outcomes.