JMIR Human Factors (Sep 2022)

Defining Recommendations to Guide User Interface Design: Multimethod Approach

  • Ceci Diehl,
  • Ana Martins,
  • Ana Almeida,
  • Telmo Silva,
  • Óscar Ribeiro,
  • Gonçalo Santinha,
  • Nelson Rocha,
  • Anabela G Silva

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/37894
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 3
p. e37894

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundFor the development of digital solutions, different aspects of user interface design must be taken into consideration. Different technologies, interaction paradigms, user characteristics and needs, and interface design components are some of the aspects that designers and developers should pay attention to when designing a solution. Many user interface design recommendations for different digital solutions and user profiles are found in the literature, but these recommendations have numerous similarities, contradictions, and different levels of detail. A detailed critical analysis is needed that compares, evaluates, and validates existing recommendations and allows the definition of a practical set of recommendations. ObjectiveThis study aimed to analyze and synthesize existing user interface design recommendations and propose a practical set of recommendations that guide the development of different technologies. MethodsBased on previous studies, a set of recommendations on user interface design was generated following 4 steps: (1) interview with user interface design experts; (2) analysis of the experts’ feedback and drafting of a set of recommendations; (3) reanalysis of the shorter list of recommendations by a group of experts; and (4) refining and finalizing the list. ResultsThe findings allowed us to define a set of 174 recommendations divided into 12 categories, according to usability principles, and organized into 2 levels of hierarchy: generic (69 recommendations) and specific (105 recommendations). ConclusionsThis study shows that user interface design recommendations can be divided according to usability principles and organized into levels of detail. Moreover, this study reveals that some recommendations, as they address different technologies and interaction paradigms, need further work.