Understanding the uptake of diagnostics for sustainable gastrointestinal nematode control by European dairy cattle farmers: a multi-country cross-sectional study
Laboratory for Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University
Hektoen Lisbeth
Department of Production Animal Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1 Veterinærbygningen
Phythian Claire J.
Department of Production Animal Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1 Veterinærbygningen
Rinaldi Laura
Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, CREMOPAR
Bosco Antonio
Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, CREMOPAR
Hinney Barbara
Institute of Parasitology, Department of Pathobiology, Vetmeduni
Gehringer Martin
LKV Lower Austria
Strube Christina
Institute for Parasitology, Centre for Infection Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover
May Katharina
Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Justus-Liebig-University of Gießen
Knubben-Schweizer Gabriela
Clinic for Ruminants with Ambulatory and Herd Health Services, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München
Martins Oliva M.D.
Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia
Mateus Teresa L.
CISAS - Center for Research and Development in Agrifood Systems and Sustainability, Escola Superior Agrária, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Rua Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun’Àlvares
Simion Violeta-Elena
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Spiru Haret University
Charlier Johannes
Kreavet
Bartley David J.
The Moredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park
Claerebout Edwin
Laboratory for Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University
To mitigate emerging anthelmintic resistance (AR) in cattle, sustainable gastrointestinal nematode control strategies should be adopted. A multi-centre study was set up to understand the factors affecting European dairy cattle farmers’ adoption of diagnostics and to gauge for differences between regions. The data were collected through a multi-lingual survey by participating countries of the European Co-operation in Science and Technology (COST) action COMbatting Anthelmintic Resistance in ruminants (COMBAR). Four countries provided sufficient data to be included in the data analysis: Norway, Italy, Germany and Austria. Three models were estimated and validated through structural equation modelling. Norway, along with Germany and Austria (pooled dataset) showed similar trends that align with previous studies. AR risk perception had no influence on the adoption intention of diagnostics, a positive influence was found for attitude towards diagnostics and subjective norms (i.e., perceived opinion of others), and a negative influence of attitudes towards anthelminthics. Additionally, routine (i.e., perception of the current treatment) had an indirect effect on adoption intention through attitudes. Italy’s data deviated from these findings, presenting a positive effect of the perceived severity of AR, and perceived behavioural control (i.e., perceived ability to perform a specific behaviour) on adoption intention of diagnostics. Finally, Norway’s data set allowed for inclusion of a measurement of current behaviour in the model, identifying a direct positive effect of the perceived actual behaviour of other farmers on their own behaviour.