Nature Communications (Nov 2023)

Paclitaxel plus carboplatin and durvalumab with or without oleclumab for women with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: the randomized SYNERGY phase I/II trial

  • Laurence Buisseret,
  • Delphine Loirat,
  • Philippe Aftimos,
  • Christian Maurer,
  • Kevin Punie,
  • Véronique Debien,
  • Paulus Kristanto,
  • Daniel Eiger,
  • Anthony Goncalves,
  • François Ghiringhelli,
  • Donatienne Taylor,
  • Florent Clatot,
  • Tom Van den Mooter,
  • Jean-Marc Ferrero,
  • Hervé Bonnefoi,
  • Jean-Luc Canon,
  • Francois P. Duhoux,
  • Laura Mansi,
  • Renaud Poncin,
  • Philippe Barthélémy,
  • Nicolas Isambert,
  • Zoë Denis,
  • Xavier Catteau,
  • Roberto Salgado,
  • Elisa Agostinetto,
  • Evandro de Azambuja,
  • Françoise Rothé,
  • Ligia Craciun,
  • David Venet,
  • Emanuela Romano,
  • John Stagg,
  • Marianne Paesmans,
  • Denis Larsimont,
  • Christos Sotiriou,
  • Michail Ignatiadis,
  • Martine Piccart-Gebhart

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42744-y
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
pp. 1 – 15

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Chemo-immunotherapy is the first-line standard of care for patients with PD-L1 positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). SYNERGY (NCT03616886) is a dose-finding phase I and a randomized phase II, open-label trial evaluating if targeting the immunosuppressive adenosine pathway can enhance the antitumor activity of chemo-immunotherapy. The phase I part included 6 patients with untreated locally-advanced or mTNBC to determine the safety and recommended phase II dose of the anti-CD73 antibody oleclumab in combination with the anti-PD-L1 durvalumab and 12 cycles of weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel. In the phase II part, 127 women were randomized 1:1 to receive chemo-immunotherapy, with (arm A) or without (arm B) oleclumab. The primary endpoint was the clinical benefit rate at week 24, defined as stable disease, partial or complete response per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, duration of response, survival outcomes (progression-free survival and overall survival), and safety. The trial did not meet its primary endpoint, as the 24-week clinical benefit rate was not significantly improved by adding oleclumab (43% vs. 44%, p = 0.61). Exploratory median progression-free survival was 5.9 months in arm A as compared to 7.0 months in arm B (p = 0.90). The safety profile was manageable in both arms.