Phase II randomised control feasibility trial of a nutrition and physical activity intervention after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
Jayne V Woodside,
Richard M Martin,
Raj Persad,
Paul Abrams,
J Athene Lane,
Lucy E Hackshaw-McGeagh,
Chris Penfold,
Ellie Shingler,
Luke A Robles,
Claire M Perks,
Jeff M P Holly,
Edward Rowe,
Anthony Koupparis,
Constance Shiridzinomwa,
Lyndsey Johnson,
Kalina M Biernacka,
Aleksandra Frankow,
Sarah Gilchrist,
Jon Oxley
Affiliations
Jayne V Woodside
Centre for Public Health, Queen`s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
Richard M Martin
reader in clinical epidemiology
Raj Persad
6 Bristol Urology Institute, Department of Urology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
Paul Abrams
honorary professor of urology
J Athene Lane
Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Lucy E Hackshaw-McGeagh
1 National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (Nutrition Theme), University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Chris Penfold
1 National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Ellie Shingler
1 National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (Nutrition Theme), University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Luke A Robles
NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Claire M Perks
5 Bristol Medical School: Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Jeff M P Holly
5 Bristol Medical School: Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Edward Rowe
6 Bristol Urology Institute, Department of Urology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
Anthony Koupparis
6 Bristol Urology Institute, Department of Urology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
Constance Shiridzinomwa
8 Clinical Research Centre, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
Lyndsey Johnson
8 Clinical Research Centre, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
Kalina M Biernacka
5 Bristol Medical School: Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Aleksandra Frankow
5 Bristol Medical School: Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Sarah Gilchrist
9 Institute for Global Food Security, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK
Jon Oxley
10 Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
Objective Dietary factors and physical activity may alter prostate cancer progression. We explored the feasibility of lifestyle interventions following radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer.Design Patients were recruited into a presurgical observational cohort; following radical prostatectomy, they were offered randomisation into a 2×3 factorial randomised controlled trial (RCT).Setting A single National Health Service trust in the South West of England, UK.Participants Those with localised prostate cancer and listed for radical prostatectomy were invited to participate.Randomisation Random allocation was performed by the Bristol Randomised Trial Collaboration via an online system.Interventions Men were randomised into both a modified nutrition group (either increased vegetable and fruit, and reduced dairy milk; or lycopene supplementation; or control) and a physical activity group (brisk walking or control) for 6 months.Blinding Only the trial statistician was blind to allocations.Primary outcome measures Primary outcomes were measures of feasibility: randomisation rates and intervention adherence at 6 months. Collected at trial baseline, three and six months, with daily adherence reported throughout. Our intended adherence rate was 75% or above, the threshold for acceptable adherence was 90%.Results 108 men entered the presurgical cohort, and 81 were randomised into the postsurgical RCT (randomisation rate: 93.1%) and 75 completed the trial. Of 25 men in the nutrition intervention, 10 (40.0%; 95% CI 23.4% to 59.3%) adhered to the fruit and vegetable recommendations and 18 (72.0%; 95% CI 52.4% to 85.7%) to reduced dairy intake. Adherence to lycopene (n=28), was 78.6% (95% CI 60.5% to 89.8%), while 21/39 adhered to the walking intervention (53.8%; 95% CI 38.6% to 68.4%). Most men were followed up at 6 months (75/81; 92.6%). Three ‘possibly related’ adverse events were indigestion, abdominal bloating and knee pain.Conclusions Interventions were deemed feasible, with high randomisation rates and generally good adherence. A definitive RCT is proposed.Trial registration number ISRCTN 99048944.
