Biodiversity Data Journal (Sep 2022)

Research Infrastructure Contact Zones: a framework and dataset to characterise the activities of major biodiversity informatics initiatives

  • Vincent Smith,
  • Lisa French,
  • Sarah Vincent,
  • Matt Woodburn,
  • Wouter Addink,
  • Christos Arvanitidis,
  • Olaf Bánki,
  • Ana Casino,
  • Francois Dusoulier,
  • Falko Glöckler,
  • Donald Hobern,
  • Martin R. Kalfatovic,
  • Dimitrios Koureas,
  • Patricia Mergen,
  • Joe Miller,
  • Leif Schulman,
  • Aino Juslén

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e82953
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10
pp. 1 – 24

Abstract

Read online Read online Read online

The landscape of biodiversity data infrastructures and organisations is complex and fragmented. Many occupy specialised niches representing narrow segments of the multidimensional biodiversity informatics space, while others operate across a broad front, but differ from others by data type(s) handled, their geographic scope and the life cycle phase(s) of the data they support. In an effort to characterise the various dimensions of the biodiversity informatics landscape, we developed a framework and dataset to survey these dimensions for ten organisations (DiSSCo, GBIF, iBOL, Catalogue of Life, iNaturalist, Biodiversity Heritage Library, GeoCASe, LifeWatch, eLTER ELIXIR), relative to both their current activities and long-term strategic ambitions.The survey assessed the contact between the infrastructure organisations by capturing the breadth of activities for each infrastructure across five categories (data, standards, software, hardware and policy), for nine types of data (specimens, collection descriptions, opportunistic observations, systematic observations, taxonomies, traits, geological data, molecular data and literature) and for seven phases of activity (creation, aggregation, access, annotation, interlinkage, analysis and synthesis). This generated a dataset of 6,300 verified observations, which have been scored and validated by leading members of each infrastructure organisation. The resulting data allow high-level questions about the overall biodiversity informatics landscape to be addressed, including the greatest gaps and contact between organisations.

Keywords