Journal of Diabetes Investigation (Jul 2019)

Ipragliflozin, a sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, reduces bodyweight and fat mass, but not muscle mass, in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients treated with insulin: A randomized clinical trial

  • Hideka Inoue,
  • Katsutaro Morino,
  • Satoshi Ugi,
  • Sachiko Tanaka‐Mizuno,
  • Keiko Fuse,
  • Itsuko Miyazawa,
  • Keiko Kondo,
  • Daisuke Sato,
  • Natsuko Ohashi,
  • Shogo Ida,
  • Osamu Sekine,
  • Masahiro Yoshimura,
  • Kiyoshi Murata,
  • Katsuyuki Miura,
  • Hisatomi Arima,
  • Hiroshi Maegawa,
  • the SUMS‐ADDIT‐1 Research group

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12985
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 4
pp. 1012 – 1021

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Aims/Introduction Sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors reduce bodyweight (BW) by creating a negative energy balance. Previous reports have suggested that this BW reduction is mainly loss of body fat and that ~20% of the reduction is lean mass. However, the effects of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on BW and body composition remain unclear. We examined these effects in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with insulin. Materials and Methods In this open‐label, randomized controlled trial, 49 overweight patients (body mass index ≥23 kg/m2) with inadequate glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c >7.0%) receiving insulin treatment were randomly assigned to receive add‐on ipragliflozin or no additional treatment (control group). Patients were followed for 24 weeks. The goal for all patients was to achieve glycated hemoglobin <7.0% without hypoglycemia. The primary end‐point was a change in BW from baseline to week 24. Body composition was assessed with dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis. Results BW change was significantly larger in the ipragliflozin group than in the control group (−2.78 vs −0.22 kg, P < 0.0001). Total fat mass was reduced evenly in the arms, lower limbs and trunk in the ipragliflozin group. Total muscle mass and bone mineral content were maintained, but muscle mass in the arms might have been affected by ipragliflozin treatment. Conclusions Ipragliflozin treatment for 24 weeks resulted in reduced BW, mainly from fat mass loss. Muscle mass and bone mineral content were maintained. Further study is necessary to elucidate the long‐term effects of ipragliflozin.

Keywords