Initial experience with three-dimensional heads-up display system for cataract surgery – A comparative study

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the complication rates, surgical time and learning curve using the 3-D Heads up display system in comparison with the conventional microscope for routine cataract surgery. Methods: Consecutive consenting adults with uncomplicated cataract were offered phacoemulsification using the 3-D Heads up display system (ARTEVO 800 Carl Zeiss Meditec) or the conventional microscope (Zeiss Lumera 700) by two experienced surgeons. Surgical time, measured from start of corneal incision to removal of microscope from the surgical field and complication rates were compared between the groups. Results: Of the 343 eyes enrolled, 100 (29%) underwent surgery using the 3-D Heads up display system. The surgical time for 3-D Heads up display system was significantly higher in the 3-D group (8.4 ± 2.1 vs. 6.5 ± 1.8 minutes, P < 0.001). There were no group differences in surgical complications (2% in 3-D vs. 2.5% in conventional microscope, P = 0.28). Comparing across 4 quartiles within the 3-D group, the mean surgical time was slightly higher during the 1st quartile (n = 25, 9.1 ± 1.9 minutes) compared to the last quartile (n = 25, 8.2 ± 1.9 minutes) (p = 0.17). Complications in the 3-D group occurred only in the initial 50% of cases. Seven (7%) cases in the 3-D group were converted to conventional binocular microscope of which 3 each were due to difficulty in depth perception and low illumination while one was due to intraoperative pupillary constriction. Conclusion: Phacoemulsification with the 3-D Heads up display system takes longer time but offers excellent visualization, ergonomics and safety compared to conventional microscopes. Experienced surgeons should be able to adapt easily after their first 50 surgeries.

Keywords

• conventional microscope
• phacoemulsification
• viewing system
• 3-d heads up display system