BJUI Compass (Feb 2024)

Effectiveness of the T‐Control catheter: A study protocol

  • Yolanda Ramallo‐Fariña,
  • Ana Toledo Chávarri,
  • Adrián Amador Robayna,
  • Max Mòdol Vidal,
  • Cristina Valcárcel‐Nazco,
  • Clara Armas Moreno,
  • Lilisbeth Perestelo‐Pérez,
  • Marta Serrano Muñoz,
  • Manuel Luque González,
  • Lidia García‐Pérez,
  • Miguel Ángel García‐Bello,
  • Pedro Serrano‐Aguilar,
  • Pedro Raúl Castellano Santana,
  • Laura Vera Álamo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.285
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5, no. 2
pp. 178 – 188

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Foley catheters have been subject to limited development in the last few decades. They fulfil their basic function of draining urine from the bladder but cause other associated problems. T‐Control is a new silicone Foley catheter with an integrated fluid control valve whose design aims to reduce the risks associated with bladder catheterisation by a multifactorial approach. The general purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of the T‐Control catheter versus the Foley‐type catheter in patients with Acute Urine Retention (AUR). Study design This is a pragmatic, open, multicentre, controlled clinical trial with random allocation to the T‐Control catheter or a conventional Foley‐type catheter in patients with AUR. Endpoints The magnitude of infections will be analysed as a primary endpoint. While as secondary endpoint, the following will be analysed: rate of symptomatic and asymptomatic infections; days free of infection; quality of life‐related to self‐perceived health; indication of associated antibiotic treatments; determination of biofilm; number of catheter‐related adverse events; use of each type of catheterisation's healthcare resources; level of satisfaction and workload of health professionals and acceptability of the T‐Control device as well as the patient experience. Patients and methods Eligible patients are male adults aged ≥50 years, with AUR and with an indication of bladder catheterisation for at least 2 weeks. The estimated sample size is 50 patients. Patient follow‐up includes both the time of catheter insertion and its removal or change 2 weeks later, plus 2 weeks after this time when the patient will be called for an in‐depth interview.

Keywords