Effects of temporal IFNγ exposure on macrophage phenotype and secretory profile: exploring GMP-Compliant production of a novel subtype of regulatory macrophages (MregIFNγ0) for potential cell therapeutic applications

Abstract

Abstract Background Macrophages are involved in tissue homeostasis, angiogenesis and immunomodulation. Proangiogenic and anti-inflammatory macrophages (regulatory macrophages, Mreg) can be differentiated in-vitro from CD14+ monocytes by using a defined cell culture medium and a stimulus of IFNγ. Aim of the study To scrutinize the potential impact of temporal IFNγ exposure on macrophage differentiation as such exposure may lead to the emergence of a distinct and novel macrophage subtype. Methods Differentiation of human CD14+ monocytes to Mreg was performed using a GMP compliant protocol and administration of IFNγ on day 6. Monocytes from the same donor were in parallel differentiated to MregIFNγ0 using the identical protocol but with administration of IFNγ on day 0. Cell characterization was performed using brightfield microscopy, automated and metabolic cell analysis, transmission electron microscopy, flow cytometry, qPCR and secretome profiling. Results Mreg and MregIFNγ0 showed no differences in cell size and volume. However, phenotypically MregIFNγ0 exhibited fewer intracellular vesicles/vacuoles but larger pseudopodia-like extensions. MregIFNγ0 revealed reduced expression of IDO and PD-L1 (P < 0.01 for both). They were positive for CD80, CD14, CD16 and CD38 (P < 0.0001vs. Mreg for all), while the majority of MregIFNγ0 did not express CD206, CD56, and CD103 on their cell surface (P < 0.01 vs. Mreg for all). In terms of their secretomes, MregIFNγ0 differed significantly from Mreg. MregIFNγ0 media exhibited reduced levels of ENA-78, Osteopontin and Serpin E1, while the amounts of MIG (CXCL9) and IP10 were increased. Conclusion Exposing CD14+ monocytes to an alternatively timed IFNγ stimulation results in a novel macrophage subtype which possess additional M1-like features (MregIFNγ0). MregIFNγ0 may therefore have the potential to serve as cellular therapeutics for clinical applications beyond those covered by M2-like Mreg, including immunomodulation and tumor treatment.

Keywords

• Macrophages
• Monocytes
• Cell therapy
• M1/M2 macrophages