BMC Gastroenterology (Jul 2020)

Cap-assisted endoscopy increases ampulla of Vater visualization in high-risk patients

  • Leonardo Correa Silva,
  • Rondinelle Martins Arruda,
  • Paula Fortuci Resende Botelho,
  • Leonardo Nogueira Taveira,
  • Kelly Menezio Giardina,
  • Marco Antonio de Oliveira,
  • Julia Dias,
  • Cleyton Zanardo Oliveira,
  • Gilberto Fava,
  • Denise Peixoto Guimarães

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01361-5
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 20, no. 1
pp. 1 – 7

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Periampullary adenocarcinoma is a major clinical problem in high-risk patients including FAP population. A recent modification for visualizing the ampulla of Vater (AV) involves attaching a cap to the tip of the forward-viewing endoscope. Our aim was to compare the rates of complete visualization of AV using this cap-assisted endoscopy (CAE) approach to standard forward-viewing endoscopy (FVE). We also determined: (i) the rates of complications and additional sedation; (ii) the mean time required for duodenal examination; and (iii) the reproducibility among endoscopists performing this procedure. Methods We performed esophagogastroduodenoscopy for AV visualization in 102 > 18 years old using FVE followed by CAE. Video recordings were blinded and randomly selected for independent expert endoscopic evaluation. Results The complete visualization rate for AV was higher in CAE (97.0%) compared to FVE (51.0%) (p < 0.001). The additional doses of fentanyl, midazolam, and propofol required for CAE were 0.05, 1.9 and 36.3 mg. in 0.9, 24.5, and 77.5% patients, respectively. The mean time of duodenal examination for AV visualization was lower on CAE compared to FVE (1.41 vs. 1.95 min, p < 0.001). Scopolamine was used in 34 FVE and 24 CAE, with no association to AV complete visualization rates (p = 0.30 and p = 0.14). Three more ampullary adenomas were detected using CAE compared to FVE. Cap displacement occurred in one patient, and there was no observed adverse effect of the additional sedatives used. Kappa values for agreement between endoscopists ranged from 0.60 to 0.85. Conclusions CAE is feasible, reproducible and safe, with a higher success rate for complete visualization compared to FVE. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02867826 , 16 August 2016.

Keywords