Vocalization categorization behavior explained by a feature-based auditory categorization model
Manaswini Kar,
Marianny Pernia,
Kayla Williams,
Satyabrata Parida,
Nathan Alan Schneider,
Madelyn McAndrew,
Isha Kumbam,
Srivatsun Sadagopan
Affiliations
Manaswini Kar
Center for Neuroscience at the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, United States; Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
Center for Neuroscience at the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, United States
Madelyn McAndrew
Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, United States; Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
Isha Kumbam
Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
Center for Neuroscience at the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, United States; Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States; Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
Vocal animals produce multiple categories of calls with high between- and within-subject variability, over which listeners must generalize to accomplish call categorization. The behavioral strategies and neural mechanisms that support this ability to generalize are largely unexplored. We previously proposed a theoretical model that accomplished call categorization by detecting features of intermediate complexity that best contrasted each call category from all other categories. We further demonstrated that some neural responses in the primary auditory cortex were consistent with such a model. Here, we asked whether a feature-based model could predict call categorization behavior. We trained both the model and guinea pigs (GPs) on call categorization tasks using natural calls. We then tested categorization by the model and GPs using temporally and spectrally altered calls. Both the model and GPs were surprisingly resilient to temporal manipulations, but sensitive to moderate frequency shifts. Critically, the model predicted about 50% of the variance in GP behavior. By adopting different model training strategies and examining features that contributed to solving specific tasks, we could gain insight into possible strategies used by animals to categorize calls. Our results validate a model that uses the detection of intermediate-complexity contrastive features to accomplish call categorization.