PLoS ONE (Jan 2020)

Detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 by droplet digital PCR in real-time PCR negative nasopharyngeal swabs from suspected COVID-19 patients.

  • Claudia Alteri,
  • Valeria Cento,
  • Maria Antonello,
  • Luna Colagrossi,
  • Marco Merli,
  • Nicola Ughi,
  • Silvia Renica,
  • Elisa Matarazzo,
  • Federica Di Ruscio,
  • Livia Tartaglione,
  • Jacopo Colombo,
  • Chiara Grimaldi,
  • Stefania Carta,
  • Alice Nava,
  • Valentino Costabile,
  • Chiara Baiguera,
  • Daniela Campisi,
  • Diana Fanti,
  • Chiara Vismara,
  • Roberto Fumagalli,
  • Francesco Scaglione,
  • Oscar Massimiliano Epis,
  • Massimo Puoti,
  • Carlo Federico Perno

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236311
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 9
p. e0236311

Abstract

Read online

Since SARS-CoV-2-based disease (COVID-19) spreads as a pandemic, the necessity of a highly sensitive molecular diagnosis that can drastically reduce false negatives reverse transcription PCR (rtPCR) results, raises as a major clinical need. Here we evaluated the performance of a ddPCR-based assay to quantify SARS-CoV-2 titer in 55 suspected COVID-19 cases with negative rtPCR results thanks to in-house ddPCR assay (targeting RdRp and host RNaseP). Samples were collected at ASST-GOM Niguarda between February and May 2020 at hospital admission. Clinical and imaging data were obtained for clinical staging and definition of disease severity. Patients were mainly female (45.5%) with a median age of 73 (57-84) years. ddPCR-based assay detected SARS-CoV-2 genome in nasopharyngeal samples of 19 (34.5%) patients (median viral-load: 128 copies/mL, IQR: 72-345). In 15 of them (78.9%), chest CT showed a classical COVID-19 bilateral interstitial pneumonia; 14 patients (73.7%) showed severe COVID-19 manifestations. ddPCR did not identify any trace of SARS-CoV-2 genome in the respiratory samples of the remaining 36 patients. The serological assay performed in a subgroup of 34 patients at the later stage of illness (from 3 days to 90 days after) confirmed the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in all patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in ddPCR (100%). Contrariwise, negative tests were observed in 95.0% ddPCR negative patients (P<0.001). Thanks to a ddPCR-based assay, we achieved a rapid and accurate SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis in rtPCR-negative respiratory samples of individuals with COVID-19 suspect, allowing the rapid taking care and correct management of these patients.