Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care (Jan 2021)

Prevalence of breast imaging reporting and data system (BIRADS) categories and breast consistencies in Central India –A cross-sectional survey

  • Megha Mittal,
  • Shravani Deolia,
  • Amit Agrawal,
  • Himanshu Chaturvedi,
  • Gaurav Agrawal,
  • Kumar G Chhabra

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2494_20
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 9
pp. 3219 – 3222

Abstract

Read online

Background: For recognizing the initial stages of breast cancer, mammography is regarded as one of the best modalities and plays a crucial part to lessen morbidity and mortality. For collaborative studies and planning of preventive strategies, it is significant to have baseline data. Thus, in this survey, the frequency distribution of breast imaging reporting and data system (BIRADS) classification and breast consistencies was investigated during the mammographic screening program in the Gwalior region, India. Material and Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional survey was conducted in the Gwalior region, India, in which 1,838 patients were screened with the aid of mammography. The mammography films were evaluated by a single radiologist who determined the BIRADS score, breast composition, and any other abnormal findings. After tabulating the data into MS Excel (MS Office version 2007 developed by Microsoft, Redmond, WA), descriptive analysis and Chi-square test were performed to determine the association between the BIRADS score and breast consistency and setting significance level at (below) 0.05. Results: The most commonly found BIRADS score was score 1 (53.4%), followed by score 2 (20.4%), and score 5 was of the least frequency (1.3%). Similarly, the most common consistency found was fatty (48.2%) and the least common was heterogeneously dense (3.97%). The most BIRADS category of 0 was seen in heterogeneously dense (n = 22; 26%) followed by dense breast compositions (n = 18; 25%). The most common consistency found with known breast malignancy (BIRADS 6) patients was the extremely dense breast (n = 11; 40.7%). Conclusion: In this study, it was observed that about 57.3% of all the cases were categorized as BIRADS 1 and 20.8% as BIRADS 2.

Keywords