Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Jun 2023)

MEDICAL RESIDENCE IN ORTHOPEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY – NATIONAL OVERVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF EVALUATION CONCORDANCE BETWEEN CNRM/SBOT DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

  • VIVIANE CRISTINA ULIANA PETERLE,
  • LUIZ KOITI KIMURA,
  • PAULO EMILIANO BEZERRA JUNIOR,
  • ANNE CAROLINE CASTRO PEREIRA,
  • BRUNA PAIVA DE FRANÇA,
  • NATHALIA MOURA RAMOS

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220233102e260339
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 31, no. spe2

Abstract

Read online

ABSTRACT Objective Describe the national scenario of the orthopedics and traumatology Medical Residency Program (MRP) in 2020/2021, showing the distribution of vacancies by states and regions of Brazil, the number of residents and the percentage of agreement between the accredited services that offer the program by the Brazilian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology (SBOT) and by the National Commission for Medical Residency linked to the Ministry of Education (CNRM/MEC). Methods This is a descriptive, cross-sectional study. Data from the CNRM and SBOT system referring to residents attending orthopedics and traumatology Programs in 2020/2021 were analyzed. Results In the analyzed period, there were 2.325 medical residents in orthopedics and traumatology in vacancies authorized by the CNRM/MEC in Brazil. The southeast region was predominant, with 57.2% of vacancies, totaling 1.331 residents. Compared to other regions, the south region with 16.9% (392), the northeast with 15.1% (351), the midwest with 7.7% (180), and the north with 3.1% (71). In addition, there was an accreditation agreement of 53.8% in evaluating services between the SBOT and CNRM, with distinctions among the states. Conclusion The analysis showed differences between regions and states, considering the vacancies of PRM in orthopedics and traumatology and the concordance of evaluations by institutions accredited by MEC and SBOT. It is aim to work together with a view to qualifying and expanding residency programs for the training of specialist physicians, in accordance with the needs of the public health system and adequate medical practice, is necessary. The analysis during the pandemic period, associated with the restructuring of several health services, demonstrates the stability of the specialty in adverse scenarios. Level of evidence II; Economic And Decision Analyzes – Developing an Economic or Decision Model.

Keywords