ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research (Jul 2023)
Economic Burden Associated with the Treatment with a Cardiovascular Polypill in Secondary Prevention in Spain: Cost-Effectiveness Results of the NEPTUNO Study
Abstract
Alberto Cordero,1,2 Regina Dalmau González-Gallarza,3 Lluis Masana,4– 6 Valentín Fuster,7,8 Jose Mª Castellano,7,9,10 José Emilio Ruiz Olivar,11 Ilonka Zsolt,11 Antoni Sicras-Mainar,12 Jose Ramón González Juanatey2,13,14 1Cardiology Service, San Juan University Hospital, Alicante, Spain; 2Cardiovascular Diseases Network Research Center (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain; 3Cardiology Service, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; 4Sant Joan University Hospital, Vascular Medicine and Metabolism Unit, Reus, Spain; 5Pere Virgili Institute of Health Research (IISPV), Reus, Spain; 6Center for Biomedical Research Network on Diabetes and Associated Metabolic Diseases (CIBERDEM), Reus, Spain; 7National Center for Cardiovascular Research (CNIC), Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain; 8Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; 9Integral Center for Cardiovascular Diseases (CIEC), Montepríncipe University Hospital, HM Hospitales Group, Madrid, Spain; 10School of Medicine, CEU San Pablo University, Madrid, Spain; 11Corporate Medical Affairs, Ferrer, Barcelona, Spain; 12Health Economics and Outcomes Research Department, Atrys Health, Madrid, Spain; 13Cardiology Service, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; 14Santiago de Compostela Health Research Institute (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, SpainCorrespondence: Antoni Sicras-Mainar, Atrys Health SA, Calle Príncipe de Vergara, 132, planta 1, Madrid, 28002, Spain, Tel +34 917 819 465, Fax +34 915 776 744, Email [email protected]: The aim of this study was to estimate health-care resources utilization, costs and cost-effectiveness associated with the treatment with CNIC-Polypill as secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) compared to other treatments, in clinical practice in Spain.Patients and Methods: An observational, retrospective study was performed using medical records (economic results [healthcare perspective], NEPTUNO-study; BIG-PAC-database) of patients who initiated secondary prevention between 2015 and 2018. Patients were followed up to 2 years (maximum). Four cohorts were balanced with a propensity-score-matching (PSM): 1) CNIC-Polypill (aspirin+atorvastatin+ramipril), 2) Monocomponents (same separate drugs), 3) Equipotent (equipotent drugs) and 4) Other therapies ([OT], other cardiovascular drugs). Incidence of cardiovascular events, health-care resources utilization and healthcare and non-healthcare costs (2020 Euros) were compared. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios per cardiovascular event avoided were estimated.Results: After PSM, 1614 patients were recruited in each study cohort. The accumulated incidence of cardiovascular events during the 24-month follow-up was lower in the CNIC-Polypill cohort vs the other cohorts (19.8% vs Monocomponents: 23.3%, Equipotent: 25.5% and OT: 26.8%; p< 0.01). During the follow-up period, the CNIC-Polypill cohort also reduced the health-care resources utilization per patient compared to the other cohorts, particularly primary care visits (16.6 vs Monocomponents: 18.7, Equipotent: 18.9 and OT: 21.0; p< 0.001) and hospitalization days (2.3 vs Monocomponents: 3.4, Equipotent: 3.7 and OT: 4.0; p< 0.001). The treatment cost in the CNIC-Polypill cohort was lower than that in the other cohorts (€ 4668 vs Monocomponents: € 5587; Equipotent: € 5682 and OT: € 6016; p< 0.001) (Difference: -€ 919, -€ 1014 and -€ 1348, respectively). Due to the reduction of cardiovascular events and costs, the CNIC-Polypill is a dominant alternative compared to the other treatments.Conclusion: CNIC-Polypill reduces recurrent major cardiovascular events and costs, being a cost-saving strategy as secondary prevention of ASCVD.Keywords: secondary prevention, cardiovascular events, use of healthcare resources, healthcare costs, Spain, CNIC-polypill
