Cancer Medicine (Sep 2020)

Clinical outcomes of definitive whole pelvic radiotherapy for clinical lymph node metastatic prostate cancer

  • Keisuke Tsuchida,
  • Koji Inaba,
  • Tairo Kashihara,
  • Naoya Murakami,
  • Kae Okuma,
  • Kana Takahashi,
  • Hiroshi Igaki,
  • Yuko Nakayama,
  • Aiko Maejima,
  • Yasuo Shinoda,
  • Yoshiyuki Matsui,
  • Motokiyo Komiyama,
  • Hiroyuki Fujimoto,
  • Yoshinori Ito,
  • Minako Sumi,
  • Takashi Nakano,
  • Jun Itami

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2985
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 18
pp. 6629 – 6637

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background In this study, we aim to present the clinical outcomes of radiotherapy (RT) in clinical pelvic lymph node‐positive prostate cancer (cN1) patients. We also analyze the prognostic factors with focus on RT dose escalation to metastatic lymph nodes (LN). Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data from cN1 patients who were treated with definitive RT and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) between June 2004 and February 2016. All patients received localized irradiation to the prostate region and whole pelvis irradiation. Some patients received intensity‐modulated radiation therapy with RT dose escalation to metastatic LN. Univariate analyses using log‐rank test were performed to find prognostic factors between patient subgroups. Results Fifty‐one consecutive patients were identified. The median follow‐up period for all patients was 88 (range 20‐157) months. Primary Gleason pattern and LN RT dose were statistically significant prognostic factors for relapse‐free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis‐free survival (DMFS). Especially, RT dose escalation (60 Gy or more) to metastatic LN significantly improved RFS and DMFS compared with standard dose RT (4‐year RFS 90.6% vs 82.1%, 7‐year RFS 90.6% vs 58.0%, P = .015; 4‐year DMFS 90.6% vs 82.1%, 7‐year DMFS 90.6% vs 62.8%, P = .023). The following factors were all statistically significant for biochemical relapse‐free survival (BRFS): T stage, LN RT dose, local RT dose, and ADT duration period. Any significantly different toxicity was not seen for each LN or local RT dose except for the incident rate of grade 2 or more acute urinary retention, which was significantly higher in the higher LN RT dose (60 Gy or more) group by the Chi‐square test. Conclusions RT dose escalation to metastatic LN in cN1 patients improves BRFS, RFS, and DMFS at 4 and 7 years, without increasing severe adverse events.

Keywords