Frontiers in Oncology (May 2023)

Treatment of loco-regional recurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a non-endemic area: oncologic outcomes, morbidity, and proposal of a prognostic nomogram

  • Vittorio Rampinelli,
  • Marco Ferrari,
  • Davide Mattavelli,
  • Pierluigi Bonomo,
  • Alessia Lambertoni,
  • Mario Turri-Zanoni,
  • Elisa D’Angelo,
  • Daniela Alterio,
  • Marco Cianchetti,
  • Barbara Vischioni,
  • Roberta Rosati,
  • Michele Tomasoni,
  • Marco Alparone,
  • Stefano Taboni,
  • Davide Tomasini,
  • Marta Maddalo,
  • Michela Buglione di Monale Bastia,
  • Nicola Alessandro Iacovelli,
  • Francesco Dionisi,
  • Maurizio Bignami,
  • Paolo Battaglia,
  • Paolo Bossi,
  • Alberto Deganello,
  • Cesare Piazza,
  • Alberto Schreiber,
  • Piero Nicolai,
  • Paolo Castelnuovo,
  • Ester Orlandi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1157584
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionThe study assessed outcomes and toxicities of different treatment modalities for local and/or regional recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in a non-endemic area.MethodsPatients treated with curative intent for recurrent NPC with salvage surgery, photon-based radiotherapy, proton therapy (PT), with or without chemotherapy, at different Italian referral centers between 1998 and 2020 were included. Adverse events and complications were classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Characteristics of the patients, tumors, treatments, and complications are presented along with uni- and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. A survival predictive nomogram is also provided.ResultsA total of 140 patients treated from 1998 to 2020 were retrospectively assessed. Cases with lower age, comorbidity rate, stage, and shorter disease-free interval (DFI) preferentially underwent endoscopic surgery. More advanced cases underwent re-irradiation, fairly distributed between photon-based radiotherapy and PT. Age and DFI were independent factors influencing overall survival. No independent prognostic effect of treatment modality was observed. No significant difference in the morbidity profile of treatments was observed, with 40% of patients experiencing at least one adverse event classified as G3 or higher.ConclusionRecurrent NPC in a non-endemic area has dissimilar aspects compared to its endemic counterpart, suggesting the need for further studies that can guide the choice of the best treatment modality.

Keywords