Frontiers in Oncology (Jan 2022)

Characterization of Synonymous BRCA1:c.132C>T as a Pathogenic Variant

  • Jun Li,
  • Jun Li,
  • Jun Li,
  • Ping Wang,
  • Cuiyun Zhang,
  • Cuiyun Zhang,
  • Cuiyun Zhang,
  • Sile Han,
  • Han Xiao,
  • Zhiyuan Liu,
  • Xiaoyan Wang,
  • Xiaoyan Wang,
  • Xiaoyan Wang,
  • Weiling Liu,
  • Bing Wei,
  • Bing Wei,
  • Bing Wei,
  • Jie Ma,
  • Jie Ma,
  • Jie Ma,
  • Hongle Li,
  • Yongjun Guo,
  • Yongjun Guo,
  • Yongjun Guo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.812656
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11

Abstract

Read online

Breast cancer gene 1 (BRCA1) and BRCA2 are tumor suppressors involved in DNA damage response and repair. Carriers of germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 have significantly increased lifetime risks of breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and other cancer types; this phenomenon is known as hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome. Accurate interpretation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants is important not only for disease management in patients, but also for determining preventative measures for their families. BRCA1:c.132C>T (p.Cys44=) is a synonymous variant recorded in the ClinVar database with “conflicting interpretations of its pathogenicity”. Here, we report our clinical tests in which we identified this variant in two unrelated patients, both of whom developed breast cancer at an early age with ovarian presentation a few years later and had a family history of relevant cancers. Minigene assay showed that this change caused a four-nucleotide loss at the end of exon 3, resulting in a truncated p.Cys44Tyrfs*5 protein. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction identified two fragments (123 and 119 bp) using RNA isolated from patient blood samples, in consistency with the results of the minigene assay. Collectively, we classified BRCA1:c.132C>T (p.Cys44=) as a pathogenic variant, as evidenced by functional studies, RNA analysis, and the patients’ family histories. By analyzing variants recorded in the BRCA Exchange database, we found synonymous changes at the ends of exons could potentially influence splicing; meanwhile, current in silico tools could not predict splicing changes efficiently if the variants were in the middle of an exon, or in the deep intron region. Future studies should attempt to identify variants that influence gene expression and post-transcription modifications to improve our understanding of BRCA1 and BRCA2, as well as their related cancers.

Keywords