Diagnostics (May 2022)

Computed Tomographic Epidurography in Patients with Low Back Pain and Leg Pain: A Single-Center Observational Study

  • Kimiaki Yokosuka,
  • Kimiaki Sato,
  • Kei Yamada,
  • Tatsuhiro Yoshida,
  • Takahiro Shimazaki,
  • Shinji Morito,
  • Kouta Nishida,
  • Atsushi Matsuo,
  • Takuma Fudo,
  • Naoto Shiba

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051267
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 5
p. 1267

Abstract

Read online

This study was conducted to analyze the findings and benefits of computed tomography (CT) epidurography in patients with low back and leg pain and compare these findings with those of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images. In total, 495 intervertebral discs from 99 patients with low back and leg pain who underwent percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis (epidural neuroplasty or percutaneous adhesiolysis) were examined. The axial views of CT epidurography were classified into six types to examine each intervertebral disc: round type, ellipse type, spike type, Benz mark, incomplete block, complete block, and non-contrast. MRI images were graded from A to D using the Schizas classification. Notably, 176 images were round-type and ellipse-type axial views, and 138 were spike-type and Benz-mark views; Schizas classification Grades A and B were observed in 272 and 47 MRI images, respectively. The incomplete block and complete block axial images did not significantly differ in CT epidurography and Schizas classification Grades C and D. The images showing Benz marks existed only at the L4/5 and L5/S intervertebral levels and only in 14.7% of patients. The ratio of normal shadows differed between MRI images and CT epidurography. Therefore, CT epidurography may enable a detailed evaluation of the epidural space.

Keywords