BMC Pediatrics (Jan 2024)

Walking capacity and its association with quality of life among children with down syndrome in Saudi Arabia

  • Saad A. Alhammad,
  • Amani S. Alqahtani,
  • Khalid S. Alwadeai,
  • Maha F. Algabbani,
  • Adel A. Alhusaini

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04519-8
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 1
pp. 1 – 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Walking ability, which has been connected to better health and independence, is one of the daily activities that is negatively impacted by Down syndrome. Thus, the objective of this study was to examine the walking capacity and its association with the quality of life of children who have Down syndrome compared to those who do not have Down syndrome in Saudi Arabia. Methods For this cross-sectional study, we recruited 68 Arabic-speaking children aged 6 to 12 using a convenience sampling method from August to November 2021. Children were divided into two groups: those who do not have Down syndrome (n = 38) and those who have Down syndrome (n = 30). Children in the Riyadh region of Saudi Arabia who do not have Down syndrome were chosen randomly from two schools. Children who have Down syndrome were selected from multiple associations and centers in the same region. A 6-minute walk test was used to measure the child’s walking capacity. The Arabic version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory scale was used to assess the child’s or parent’s perceptions of the child’s quality of life and its physical, emotional, social, and school functioning domains. Results The difference in the mean 6-minute walk test scores between children who have and who do not have Down syndrome was statistically significant, with a mean difference = 105.6, 95% confidence limit = 57.2—154.0, p < .0001. The linear regression analysis after adjusting for age, height, weight, and body mass index revealed that walking capacity was found to be significantly associated with the worst score on the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory scale (β = −2.71, SE = 0.49, p < .0001) and its domains of physical, social, and school functioning (β = −2.29, SE = 0.54, p < .0001; β = −2.40, SE = 0.58; p = .001; β = −3.71, SE = 0.56, p = .002, respectively) in children who have Down syndrome, but they had better emotional functioning than children who do not have Down syndrome. Conclusions Children who have Down syndrome were less able to walk and were highly associated with the worst possible quality of life, which included the lowest levels of physical, social, and school functioning. Early interventions with techniques must be developed to improve the quality of life for these children.

Keywords