Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry (Jun 2024)

Bibliometric Network Analysis and Visualization of Research Trends in Gingivectomy

  • Koerniadi MMU,
  • Tadjoedin FM,
  • Hutomo DI,
  • Tadjoedin ESS,
  • Rizal MI,
  • Sulijaya B

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 16
pp. 209 – 218

Abstract

Read online

Marius Marcello Utomo Koerniadi,1 Fatimah Maria Tadjoedin,2 Dimas Ilham Hutomo,2 Ette Soraya S Tadjoedin,2 Muhammad Ihsan Rizal,3 Benso Sulijaya2 1Undergraduate Program, International Class, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia; 2Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia; 3Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, IndonesiaCorrespondence: Benso Sulijaya, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Salemba Raya No. 4, Jakarta Pusat, 10430, Indonesia, Email [email protected]; [email protected]: Gingivectomy has been the preferred method since the findings in 1884. It evolved from “blind” subgingival scaling to “the excision of the soft tissue”. The use of these techniques is no longer mandatory in clinical situations; therefore, researchers have searched for numerous publications that have been registered regarding gingivectomy. This research aims to fill the niche area by assessing more about gingivectomy and it’s trend among the periodontology topic of discussion.Methods: Descriptive and analytical observation by evaluating the result of the VOS viewer mapping and calculation throughout the bibliographic data from publications obtained from SCOPUS in July 2022.Results: There are 660 publications from six types of publication. Related keywords are compiled and visualized by network mapping. There is a significant gap among the contributing countries in the number of documents and number of citations per journal. However, a minimal gap is seen in other objectives, such as authors, journals, and institutions on their contribution towards the publication of gingivectomy topics.Conclusion: A total of 660 of 1914 articles were included in the analysis after the filtering process, and these articles were cited 5910 times, with an average of 9 citations per article.Keywords: gingivectomy, gingival excision, periodontal surgery, oral surgery, bibliometric analysis, scientific review, performance analysis, dentistry, periodontology

Keywords