npj Viruses (Dec 2024)

Automated and virus variant-programmable surrogate test qualitatively compares to the gold standard SARS-CoV-2 neutralization assay

  • Danielle W. Ali,
  • Maggie L. Bartlett,
  • Christopher D. Heger,
  • Francisco Ramirez,
  • Linwood Johnson,
  • Kevin L. Schully,
  • Eric D. Laing,
  • Wei Wang,
  • Carol D. Weiss,
  • Emilie Goguet,
  • Christopher C. Broder,
  • Stephanie A. Richard,
  • Nusrat J. Epsi,
  • Brian Agan,
  • David Tribble,
  • Mark P. Simons,
  • Timothy H. Burgess,
  • Edward Mitre,
  • Simon Pollett,
  • Darci R. Smith

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44298-024-00083-9
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2, no. 1
pp. 1 – 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract The ongoing emergence of new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants underscores the need for rapid, adaptable, high-throughput testing. However, assays for neutralizing antibodies, which are a good measure of viral protection, usually require cell culture and either infectious SARS-CoV-2 or pseudotyped viral particles. To circumvent the challenges of cell-based assays, SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus neutralization tests (sVNTs) measure inhibition of the binding of the spike (S) protein receptor binding domain (RBD) to its receptor, human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2) by neutralizing antibodies. Here we tested a prototype automated microfluidic cartridge-based sVNT platform using SARS-CoV-2 wild-type (WT) and B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant RBDs. This sVNT showed a high correlation with cell-based neutralization assays for biospecimens collected post-COVID-19 vaccination and post-SARS-CoV-2 infection as well as for pre-pandemic SARS-CoV-2 negative sera. Thus, this assay, which takes less than 80 min, is a relatively simple, safe, and accurate alternative to traditional VNTs.