Comparative Study of the Relationship between Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Aluminum Alloy 5056 Fabricated by Additive Manufacturing and Rolling Techniques
Alexey Evstifeev,
Darya Volosevich,
Ivan Smirnov,
Bulat Yakupov,
Artem Voropaev,
Evgeniy Vitokhin,
Olga Klimova-Korsmik
Affiliations
Alexey Evstifeev
Mathematics and Mechanics Faculty, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg 199034, Russia
Darya Volosevich
World-Class Research Center, State Marine Technical University, Saint Petersburg 119991, Russia
Ivan Smirnov
Mathematics and Mechanics Faculty, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg 199034, Russia
Bulat Yakupov
Mathematics and Mechanics Faculty, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg 199034, Russia
Artem Voropaev
World-Class Research Center, State Marine Technical University, Saint Petersburg 119991, Russia
Evgeniy Vitokhin
World-Class Research Center, State Marine Technical University, Saint Petersburg 119991, Russia
Olga Klimova-Korsmik
World-Class Research Center, State Marine Technical University, Saint Petersburg 119991, Russia
In recent years, additive manufacturing of products made from 5000 series alloys has grown in popularity for marine and automotive applications. At the same time, little research has been aimed at determining the permissible load ranges and areas of application, especially in comparison with materials obtained by traditional methods. In this work, we compared the mechanical properties of aluminum alloy 5056 produced by wire-arc additive technology and rolling. Structural analysis of the material was carried out using EBSD and EDX. Tensile tests under quasi-static loading and impact toughness tests under impact loading were also carried out. SEM was used to examine the fracture surface of the materials during these tests. The mechanical properties of the materials under quasi-static loading conditions exhibit a striking similarity. Specifically, the yield stress σ0.2 was measured at 128 MPa for the industrially manufactured AA5056_IM and 111 MPa for the AA5056_AM. In contrast, impact toughness tests showed that AA5056_AM KCVfull was 190 kJ/m2, half that of AA5056_IM KCVfull, which was 395 kJ/m2.