دراسات: علوم الشريعة والقانون (Dec 2020)
The Effect of Rational Consideration on the Conditions for accepting the narration of Alaahaad According to Fundamentalists: A Study of the Reality of the Story, the Narrated and the Narrator
Abstract
Scholars multiplied attention to ways to verify the authenticity of narrations. The fundamentalists and jurists had another condition other than the conditions of the modernists. The rooting of these conditions for the fundamentalists was based on the rational consideration that judges - based on these conditions - the validity and reliability of narration. Therefore, these conditions are nothing but a response to what is likely to be wrong or proven to be wrong, by ruling on its justification. It is not - as some imagine - a response to the hadith of the Messenger of God - may God bless him and grant him peace - after it has been proven, or a turning away from it on the part of the mujtahid after its authenticity. These conditions are agreed upon by scholars, which is to reject the narrations of the Aahaad, which there were reasons for its frequency. They differed in some of the others, as a response to the one-to-one narration of what is common in the tribulation, or the one-to-one narration that contradicts the rules of origins, with certain conditions that, according to those who say them, doubt the accuracy of the narration and the authenticity of the transmission. This was the subject of discussion by other scholars, which is what this research addressed in its sections.
