Can Patient Reported Outcomes be Used to Eliminate Unnecessary Follow Up Clinic Visits after Surgery?

Abstract

Category: Other; Ankle; Hindfoot; Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Patient reported outcomes (PROs) have been a powerful tool to inform clinicians on the success or failure of various treatments including surgery. Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a suite of validated symptom-based questions designed to be asked and answered directly by the patient to track treatment progress quickly and accurately. This study uses PROMIS to determine the duration between foot and ankle surgery and assessment of a successful outcome. Additionally, we retrospectively calculate the savings that would be realized by eliminating unnecessary office visits if this model was implemented in clinical practice. Methods: Retrospective PROMIS Pain Interference (PI) data were obtained for common elective foot (n=832) and ankle (n=851) surgical procedures. Patients were categorized into quartiles of their pre-operative PI score - quartile 1 (Q1) being 25% of patients with the lowest PI scores. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was defined by the ½ standard-deviation of the pre- operative pain interference t-scores. A patient was considered recovered after observing two consecutive MCID decreases in post-operative pain interference t-scores. A cox proportional hazards model stratified by preoperative PI score quartile was used to predict probability patient recovery after adjusting for age, race, ethnicity, gender, and primary payor. The average and total potential savings for the cohort was derived using the number of patient-visits post-recovery. Results: Two consecutive decreases in MCID measured by PI PROMIS t-scores were achieved 90 days post-operatively by 16%, 16%, 17%, and 23% of post-operative ankle patients in quartiles 1-4 respectively; post-operative foot patients achieved 18%, 11%, 20%, and 26% in quartiles 1-4 respectively (see Figure 1). Days 30-60 recorded the greatest rate of improvement across quartiles with Q4 showing the greatest improvement. The least improvement occurred between days 90-120 across all quartiles. Patients were seen by the orthopedics departments on average 2.84 times after achieving two consecutive MCID improvements, totaling to $243.63 in expenses to institutional payers per patient. Avoiding these excess visits even after MCID achievement could result in savings ranging from $38,593 to $122,002. Conclusion: PI PROMIS t-scores can be used to assess the need for ongoing follow up for surgical patients. If there is evidence that the patient has improved a clinically meaningful amount on two successive visits additionally follow-up may not be needed. Using PROs in clinical decision-making pathways as suggested in this research will eliminate unnecessary visits and save healthcare dollars and valuable resources