Frontiers in Psychology (Aug 2024)

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Academic Resilience Scale-30 (C-ARS-30) in college students

  • Wen-ying Tan,
  • Jia-ni Chen,
  • Sui-hua Lu,
  • Chun-qin Liu,
  • Qing Luo,
  • Yu Ma,
  • Ying Zhou,
  • Thomas K. S. Wong,
  • Hui-fang Chen,
  • Li-qin Song,
  • Chu-yuan Miao,
  • Jing-wen Chen,
  • Graeme D. Smith

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1276618
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundAmidst the expansion of student enrollment in higher education, the well-being and retention rates of students have emerged as important concerns. Resilience, especially academic resilience, a multidimensional construct that can lead to academic success in adversity, is pivotal in enabling students to successfully cope with academic challenges. While the Academic Resilience Scale-30 (ARS-30) has been validated as an effective instrument in various languages, its applicability for Chinese students in higher education remains unexplored.ObjectiveThis study aims to translate and validate the ARS-30 in Chinese, assessing its reliability and validity among Chinese college students in higher education.MethodsA convenience sample of 1,542 students participated in this study. The inventory included the demographic form, Chinese version of ARS-30 (C-ARS-30), 10-item Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10), and General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES). The assessment of validity was conducted by analyzing content validity, construct validity, convergent and discriminant validity, as well as criterion-related validity. Construct validity was evaluated through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM). Reliability analysis was performed using Cronbach’s alpha and test–retest reliability.ResultsThe C-ARS-30 demonstrated commendable content validity, with the CVI value of items ranging from 0.833 to 1.000, and a total scale CVI of 0.986. ESEM analysis revealed a solid four-factor structure, maintaining the scale’s 30 items with excellent fit indices (χ2/df = 2.647, CFI = 0.937, TLI = 0.915, RMSEA = 0.057, SRMR = 0.027). The total score of C-ARS-30 exhibited positive correlations with the CD-RISC-10 (r = 0.542) and the GSES (r = 0.488). The scale demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.930) and test–retest reliability (0.794, p < 0.01).ConclusionThe C-ARS-30 is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing academic resilience among Chinese college students, offering a valuable tool for educational and psychological evaluations.

Keywords