BMC Cardiovascular Disorders (Jun 2019)

β-blockers and risk of all-cause mortality in patients with chronic heart failure and atrial fibrillation—a meta-analysis

  • Tianyu Xu,
  • Yuli Huang,
  • Haobin Zhou,
  • Yujia Bai,
  • Xingfu Huang,
  • Yunzhao Hu,
  • Dingli Xu,
  • Yuhui Zhang,
  • Jian Zhang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1079-2
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Effects of β-blockers on outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) is still in controversy. Methods Searching was conducted by using keywords “atrial fibrillation”, and “heart failure” in PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase databases before November 30, 2017. Prospective studies [i.e. randomized control trials (RCTs), post-hoc analysis of RCTs, prospective cohort studies and registry studies] that studied the effect of β-blockers and all-cause mortality in patients with CHF and AF were included. The analysis was stratified by study design. Results We identified 12 studies, including 6 post-hoc analysis of RCTs and 6 observational studies (including prospective registry studies and prospective cohort studies), which enrolled 38,133 patients with CHF and AF. Overall, β-blockers treatment was associated with significant decrease in all-cause mortality [Risk Ratio (RR) =0.73; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.65–0.82, P < 0.001]. When stratified by study design, β-blockers treatment was associated with 34% reduction in patients with CHF and AF in observational study (RR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.58–0.76, P < 0. 001), but not in post-hoc analysis of RCT (RR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.74–1.02, P = 0.09). Conclusions β-blockers treatment was associated with significantly decrease the risk of all-cause mortality in patients with AF-CHF and it was only seen in observational study group, but not in subgroup analysis of RCT group. Further large RCTs are required to verify the effect of β-blockers treatment on patients with CHF and AF. The main limitation of this study is the lack of individual data on patients in each study.

Keywords