Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (Aug 2021)

Revisiting Spasticity After Stroke: Clustering Clinical Characteristics for Identifying At-Risk Individuals

  • Ahmedy F,
  • Mohd Tuah N,
  • Mohamad Hashim N,
  • Sybil Shah S,
  • Ahmedy I,
  • Tan SF

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 14
pp. 2391 – 2396

Abstract

Read online

Fatimah Ahmedy,1 Nooralisa Mohd Tuah,2 Natiara Mohamad Hashim,3 Syahiskandar Sybil Shah,4 Ismail Ahmedy,5 Soo Fun Tan2 1Rehabilitation Medicine Unit, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia; 2Faculty of Computing & Informatics, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia; 3Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sg. Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia; 4Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia; 5Department of Computer System & Technology, Faculty of Computer Science & Information Technology, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaCorrespondence: Fatimah AhmedyRehabilitation Medicine Unit, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, Kota Kinabalu, 88846, Sabah, MalaysiaTel +60138805513Email [email protected]: To collectively identify the clinical characteristics determining the risk of developing spasticity after stroke.Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at a single rehabilitation outpatient clinic from June to December 2019. Inclusion criteria were stroke duration of over four weeks, aged 18 years and above. Exclusion criteria were presence of concurrent conditions other than stroke that could also lead to spasticity. Recruited patients were divided into “Spasticity” and “No spasticity” groups. Univariate analysis was deployed to identify significant predictive spasticity factors between the two groups followed by a two-step clustering approach for determining group of characteristics that collectively contributes to the risk of developing spasticity in the “Spasticity” group.Results: A total of 216 post-stroke participants were recruited. The duration after stroke (p < 0.001) and the absence of hemisensory loss (p = 0.042) were two significant factors in the “Spasticity” group revealed by the univariate analysis. From a total of 98 participants with spasticity, the largest cluster of individuals (40 patients, 40.8%) was those within less than 20 months after stroke with moderate stroke and absence of hemisensory loss, while the smallest cluster was those within less than 20 months after severe stroke and absence of hemisensory loss (21 patients, 21.4%).Conclusion: Analyzing collectively the significant factors of developing spasticity may have the potential to be more clinically relevant in a heterogeneous post-stroke population that may assist in the spasticity management and treatment.Keywords: spasticity, stroke rehabilitation, clinical characteristics, clustering analysis

Keywords