PeerJ (Feb 2025)

A nicotinamide metabolism-related gene signature for predicting immunotherapy response and prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma patients

  • Meng Wang,
  • Wei Li,
  • Fang Zhou,
  • Zheng Wang,
  • Xiaoteng Jia,
  • Xingpeng Han

DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.18991
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13
p. e18991

Abstract

Read online Read online

Background Nicotinamide (NAM) metabolism fulfills crucial functions in tumor progression. The present study aims to establish a NAM metabolism-correlated gene (NMRG) signature to assess the immunotherapy response and prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Methods The training set and validation set (the GSE31210 dataset) were collected The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), respectively. Molecular subtypes of LUAD were classified by consensus clustering. Mutation landscape of the top 20 somatic genes was visualized by maftools package. Subsequently, differential expression analysis was conducted using the limma package, and univariate, multivariate and LASSO regression analyses were performed on the screened genes to construct a risk model for LUAD. Next, the MCP-counter, TIMER and ESTIMATE algorithms were utilized to comprehensively assess the immune microenvironmental profile of LUAD patients in different risk groups. The efficacy of immunotherapy and chemotherapy drugs was evaluated by TIDE score and pRRophetic package. A nomogram was created by integrating RiskScore and clinical features. The mRNA expressions of independent prognostic NMRGs and the migration and invasion of LUAD cells were measured by carrying out cellular assays. Results Two subtypes (C1 and C2) of LUAD were classified, with C1 subtype showing a worse prognosis than C2. The top three genes with a high mutation frequency in C1 and C2 subtypes were TTN (45.25%), FLG (25.25%), and ZNF536 (19.8%). Four independent prognostic NMRGs (GJB3, CPA3, DKK1, KRT6A) were screened and used to construct a RiskScore model, which exhibited a strong predictive performance. High-risk group showed low immune cell infiltration, high TIDE score, and worse prognosis, and the patients in this group exhibited a high drug sensitivity to Cisplatin, Erlotinib, Paclitaxel, Saracatini, and CGP_082996. A nomogram was established with an accurate predictive and diagnostic performance. GJB3, DKK1, CPA3, and KRT6A were all high- expressed in LUAD cells, and silencing GJB3 inhibited the migration and invasion of LUAD cells. Conclusion A novel NMRG signature was developed, contributing to the prognostic evaluation and personalized treatment for LUAD patients.

Keywords