Journal of Clinical and Translational Science (Mar 2019)

3007 Addressing Community Health Needs through Community Engagement Research Advisory Boards

  • Christi Patten,
  • Monica L. Albertie,
  • Chara A. Chamie,
  • Tabetha A. Brockman,
  • Mary Gorfine,
  • Rosa Nicholas,
  • Martha J. Bock,
  • Janet M. Okamoto,
  • Sumedha G. Penheiter,
  • Joyce E. Balls-Berry

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.191
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3
pp. 82 – 82

Abstract

Read online

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Over 80% of CTSA programs have a community advisory board (CAB), an effective strategy to increase community engagement (CE) in research. Little is known about how the research discussed with CABs aligns with community priorities (i.e., bi-directionality). This program evaluation assessed the health topics presented by researchers to the CABs linked to our CE Program at all three Mayo Clinic sites (MN, AZ, and FL) for relevance to local community needs. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Two coders classified Mayo researcher presentations to our CABs from 2014-2018 for relevance to needs identified in the local 2013 and/or 2016 County Health Needs Assessments and specific topic(s); with high levels of agreement (Kappa=0.90). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Overall, of the 65 presentations 41 (63%) addressed one or more local health needs (47% MN, 60% FL, 80% AZ). Cross-cutting health topics addressed at 2 sites were physical activity/obesity/nutrition and mental health. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Findings were shared with our CABs to obtain input on future directions. The FL and AZ CABs are systematic in seeking out or initiating research projects that address local health needs, an approach the MN site is interested in adopting. Ultimately, it is important to demonstrate improved health outcomes with CTSA-based CE research strategies. Understanding community health needs and depth of researchers in those areas may help to focus priorities for demonstrating such outcomes.