Cancer Medicine (Feb 2024)

Clinical utility of the Oncomine Dx Target Test multi‐CDx system and the possibility of utilizing those original sequence data

  • Ayaka Saito,
  • Hideki Terai,
  • Tae‐Jung Kim,
  • Katsura Emoto,
  • Ryutaro Kawano,
  • Kohei Nakamura,
  • Hideyuki Hayashi,
  • Hatsuyo Takaoka,
  • Akihiko Ogata,
  • Katsuhito Kinoshita,
  • Fumimaro Ito,
  • Lisa Shigematsu,
  • Masahiko Okada,
  • Takahiro Fukushima,
  • Akifumi Mitsuishi,
  • Taro Shinozaki,
  • Keiko Ohgino,
  • Shinnosuke Ikemura,
  • Hiroyuki Yasuda,
  • Ichiro Kawada,
  • Kenzo Soejima,
  • Hiroshi Nishihara,
  • Koichi Fukunaga

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.7077
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 4
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Companion diagnostic tests play a crucial role in guiding treatment decisions for patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The Oncomine Dx Target Test (ODxTT) Multi‐CDx System has emerged as a prominent companion diagnostic method. However, its efficacy in detecting driver gene mutations, particularly rare mutations, warrants investigation. Aims This study aimed to assess the performance of the ODxTT in detecting driver gene mutations in NSCLC patients. Specifically, we aimed to evaluate its sensitivity in detecting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, a key determinant of treatment selection in NSCLC. Materials and Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of NSCLC patients who underwent testing with the ODxTT at Keio University Hospital between May 2020 and March 2022. Patient samples were subjected to both DNA and RNA tests. Driver gene mutation status was assessed, and instances of missed mutations were meticulously examined. Results Of the 90 patients, five had nucleic acid quality problems, while 85 underwent both DNA and RNA tests. Driver gene mutations were detected in 56/90 (62.2%) patients. Of the 34 patient specimens, driver mutations were not detected using the ODxTT; however, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations were detected using polymerase chain reaction‐based testing in two patients, and a KRAS mutation was detected by careful examination of the sequence data obtained using the ODxTT in one patient. For the above three cases, carefully examining the gene sequence information obtained using the ODxTT could identify driver mutations that were not mentioned in the returned test results. Additionally, we confirmed comparable instances of overlook results for EGFR mutations in the dataset from South Korea, implying that this type of oversight could occur in other countries using the ODxTT. EGFR mutation was missed in ODxTT in Japan (6.3%, 2/32), South Korea (2.0%, 1/49), and overall (3.7%, 3/81). Conclusion Even if sufficient tumor samples are obtained, rare EGFR mutations (which are excluded from the ODxTT's genetic mutation list) might not be detected using the current ODxTT system due to the program used for sequence analysis. However, such rare EGFR mutations can still be accurately detected on ODxTT's sequence data using next‐generation sequencing.

Keywords